Uncovering the Hidden Logic Behind Corporate Cash Holding Behavior in Emerging Markets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/gijea.v4i4.1035Keywords:
Corporate Cash Ownership, Corporate Finance, Corporate Governance, Institutional Environment, Emerging MarketsAbstract
Corporate cash ownership is an important issue in corporate finance because it relates to liquidity, investment efficiency, and firm resilience amid economic uncertainty. This study analyzes corporate cash ownership behavior in non-financial companies listed on emerging market capital markets up to 2024. The objective of this study is to examine the determinants of cash ownership and the moderating role of corporate governance quality and investor protection. This study uses panel data regression with a fixed effect approach and dynamic panel models. The results show that firms in emerging markets tend to maintain higher cash levels in response to financing constraints, cash flow volatility, and institutional uncertainty. Growth opportunities and prudential motives have a positive effect on cash ownership, while leverage and access to external financing have a negative effect. Furthermore, corporate governance quality and investor protection significantly moderate the relationship between firm characteristics and cash ownership. Weak institutional environments strengthen prudential motives and agency concerns. This study concludes that corporate cash ownership in emerging markets is shaped not only by financial factors but also by governance and institutional conditions.
References
Ahmad, M. M., Hunjra, A. I., Islam, F., & Zureigat, Q. (2023). Does asymmetric information affect firm’s financing decisions? International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(9), 2718–2734. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-01-2021-0086
Ai, H., Frank, M. Z., & Sanati, A. (2020). The trade-off theory of corporate capital structure.
Akhtar, T. (2024). Are the motives of holding cash differing between developed and emerging financial markets? Kybernetes, 53(5), 1653–1681. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2021-0223
Akhtar, T. (2025). Cash holdings in MENA region: evidence from trade-off model, pecking order theory, and agency theory. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 33. 10.1186/s43093-025-00454-5
Akhtar, T., Tareq, M. A., & Rashid, K. (2021). Chief executive officers’ monitoring, board effectiveness, managerial ownership, and cash holdings: Evidence from ASEAN. Review of Managerial Science, 15(8), 2193–2238. 10.1007/s11846-020-00421-0
Ararat, M., Claessens, S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2021). Corporate governance in emerging markets: A selective review and an agenda for future research. Emerging Markets Review, 48, 100767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100767
Arianpoor, A., & Mehrfard, N. (2023). The impact of managerial attributes on cash holding and investment efficiency and the mediator role of cash holding. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(4), 610–628. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-02-2022-0046
Arifaj, A. H., Berisha, V., Morina, F., & Avdyli, E. (2023). Exploring the impact of cash flow, company size, and debt on financial performance in corporations. Investment Management & Financial Innovations, 20(3), 264. 10.21511/imfi.20(3).2023.22
Bakhtiari, S., Breunig, R., Magnani, L., & Zhang, J. (2020). Financial constraints and small and medium enterprises: A review. Economic Record, 96(315), 506–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12560
Berthod, O. (2023). Institutional theory of organizations. In Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 6789–6793). Springer.
Christie, N. (2025). Constraints and Costs: Essays in Corporate Finance (Vol. 175, Issue 175). Lund University.
Farooq, U., Al-Gamrh, B., & Dai, J. (2024). Green drives greenbacks: The impact of sustainable innovation on corporate cash holdings in BRICS nations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 436, 140533. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140533
Frank, M. Z., Goyal, V. K., & Shen, T. (2020). The pecking order theory of capital structure: Where do we stand?
González, P. S., Vanti, A. A., & de Ludícibus, S. (2023). Corporate governance and management accounting to reduce agency conflicts. Cuadernos de Contabilidad, 24(24), 13.
Grant, A., Cordle, M., & Bridgwater, E. (2020). Quality of recycling: Towards an operational definition. Publications Office of the European Union, 60.
Houqe, M. N., Monem, R. M., & van Zijl, T. (2023). Business strategy, cash holdings, and dividend payouts. Accounting & Finance, 63(4), 3999–4035. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13082
Imbeau, L., Tomkinson, S., & Malki, Y. (2021). Descriptive, explanatory and interpretive approaches. Research Methods in the Social Sciences: An AZ of Key Concepts, 81–85.
Magerakis, E., & Tzelepis, D. (2020). The impact of business strategy on corporate cash policy. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(4), 677–699. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-05-2019-0077
Manoel, A. A. S., & Moraes, M. B. da C. (2022). Accounting conservatism and corporate cash levels: Empirical evidence from Latin America. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 30(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12403
Mazhar, S. A., Anjum, R., Anwar, A. I., & Khan, A. A. (2021). Methods of data collection: A fundamental tool of research. Journal of Integrated Community Health, 10(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12403Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Moin, A., Guney, Y., & El Kalak, I. (2020). The effects of ownership structure, sub-optimal cash holdings and investment inefficiency on dividend policy: evidence from Indonesia. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 55(3), 857–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-019-00862-z
Ning, J., Wang, G., Xiong, F., & Yin, S. (2024). Green credit policy and corporate excess cash holdings. Plos One, 19(1), e0294079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294079
Nuriye, A. A., & Gatauwa, J. M. (2024). Prudential Regulatory Framework and Financial Performance of Micro Finance Institutions in Kenya.
Öztürk, O., & Bağış, M. (2025). Bridging resource dependence theory and resource-based view: a theoretical synthesis. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2024-1071
Pandey, N., Andres, C., & Kumar, S. (2023). Mapping the corporate governance scholarship: Current state and future directions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(1), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12444Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Rodriguez, M. (2024). Trade-off and Pecking order theories in corporate financing: insights from Argentina. Journal of Business and Economic Options, 7(4), 23–32.
Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are different research approaches? Comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538
TF Abuhijleh, S., & AA Zaid, M. (2023). Do political connections shape the nexus between board attributes and corporate cash holdings? EuroMed Journal of Business, 18(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-09-2021-0136
Tijjani, A., & Bello, M. (2019). Corporate ownership and dividend policy: agency theory perspectives. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies, 6(7), 90–96.
Ullah, S., Akhtar, P., & Zaefarian, G. (2018). Dealing with endogeneity bias: The generalized method of moments (GMM) for panel data. Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-01-2021-0086
Zhao, J., Wang, M., & He, Q. (2023). Cash holdings, the internal capital market, and capital allocation efficiency in listed companies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 827–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2080740
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Erry Setiawan, Kusiyah Kusiyah, Pilipus Ramandei, Subur Harahap

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright :
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
- The author acknowledges that the GIJEA has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at GIJEA.























