Unpacking Consumer Shift to Electric Motorcycles in Jabodetabek: An Extended Push-Pull-Mooring Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/gijea.v4i4.1339Keywords:
Electric Vehicle, Push Factor, Pull Factor, Mooring Factor, Adoption IntentionAbstract
This study aims to determine the effect of push, pull, and mooring factors on the adoption intention of electric motorbikes in Jakarta. This study employed a quantitative approach using primary data collected through an online survey with a research instrument measured using a Likert scale. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling, involving 240 respondents who were individuals aged 17 years and above, owned a motorcycle, had either adopted or had the potential to switch to an electric motorcycle, and were domiciled in Jakarta. The results indicate that the push factor has a positive and significant effect on the adoption intention of electric motorbikes, with a path coefficient (β) of 0.215 and a t-value of 3.389. The pull factor also has a positive and significant effect on adoption intention, with a path coefficient (β) of 0.362 and a t-value of 4.533. Similarly, the mooring factor has a positive and significant effect on adoption intention, with a path coefficient (β) of 0.266 and a t-value of 4.171. The coefficients of determination (R²) for the push, pull, and mooring factors are 0.059, 0.135, and 0.113, respectively. Furthermore, the mooring factor is able to moderate the relationship between the push factor and the intention to adopt electric motorbikes. However, the mooring factor is unable to moderate the relationship between the pull factor and the intention to adopt electric motorbikes in Jakarta.
References
Abdillah, W., & Jogiyanto. (2011). Partial Least Square (PLS), Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dalam Penelitian Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Adittya, A. P. (2024) ‘Kebijakan Kendaraan Bermotor Listrik Berbasis Baterai (KBLBB) dalam Transisi Energi di Indonesia Kebijakan Kendaraan Bermotor Listrik Berbasis Baterai (KBLBB) dalam Transisi Energi di Indonesia’, Analisis Kebijakan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 1(1), pp. 0–21.
Ahmad, S., Chaveeesuk, S. and Chaiyasoonthorn, W. (2024) ‘The adoption of electric vehicle in Thailand with the moderating role of charging infrastructure: an extension of a UTAUT’, International Journal of Sustainable Energy, pp. 1–26. doi: 10.1080/14786451.2024.2387908.
Alwadain, A., Fati, S. M. and Id, K. A. (2024) ‘From theory to practice : An integrated TTF- UTAUT study on electric vehicle adoption behavior’, Plos One, 19(3), pp. 1–19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297890.
Bhattacharyya, S. S. and Thakre, S. (2020) ‘Exploring the factors influencing electric vehicle adoption : an empirical investigation in the emerging economy context of India’, Foresight Journal, (August), pp. 1–16. doi: 10.1108/FS-04-2020-0037.
Faturrochman, M. and Yaasiin, T. H. (2024) ‘Efektivitas Subsidi Kendaraan Listrik terhadap Perkembangan Industri Otomotif dalam Mewujudkan Program Making Indonesia 4 . 0’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Sustainability, 1(3), pp. 1–17.
Ferreira, L., Oliveira, T. and Neves, C. (2023) ‘Consumer’s intention to use and recommend smart home technologies: The role of environmental awareness’, Energy. Elsevier Ltd, 263(PC), p. 125814. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125814.
Ghazali, E. M. and Yee, E. (2019) ‘Elucidating the drivers of residential mobility and housing choice behaviour in a suburban township via push – pull – mooring framework’, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. Springer Netherlands, (0123456789). doi: 10.1007/s10901-019-09705-8.
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications Using SmartPLS 3.0 for Empirical Research. Semarang: Diponegoro University Press.
Gkargkavouzi, A. (2019) ‘Resources , Conservation & Recycling Environmental behavior in a private-sphere context : Integrating theories of planned behavior and value belief norm , self-identity and habit’, Resources, Conservation & Recycling. Elsevier, 148(January), pp. 145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.039.
Guo, J., Shan, S. and Wang, Y. (2021) ‘Analyzing Chinese Customers ’ Switching Intention of Smartphone Brands : Integrating the Push-Pull-Mooring Framework’, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society factors, 1(1). doi: 10.1155/2021/6660340.
Ha, T. T. and Nguyen, T. C. (2023) ‘Investigation of Influential Factors of Intention to Adopt Electric Vehicles for Motorcyclists in Vietnam’, Sustainability, 15(1), pp. 1–16.
Haustein, S. and Jensen, A. F. (2018) ‘Factors of electric vehicle adoption : A comparison of conventional and electric car users based on an extended theory of planned behavior users based on an extended theory of planned behavior’, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. Taylor & Francis, 0(0), pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1398790.
Higueras-castillo, E., Kalinic, Z. and Marinkovic, V. (2020) ‘A mixed analysis of perceptions of electric and hybrid vehicles’, Energy Policy, 136(March 2019). doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111076.
Hong, T., Nguyen, N. and Ching-, J. Y. (2021) ‘Understanding consumer’ switching intention toward traceable agricultural products: Push- pull- mooring perspective’, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 1(May), pp. 1–19. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12733.
Hou, A. and Shiau, W. L. (2019) ‘Understanding Facebook to Instagram migration: a push-pull migration model perspective’, Information Technology & People, 33(1), pp. 272–295. doi: 10.1108/ITP-06-2017-0198.
Huang, X. and Ge, J. (2019) ‘Electric vehicle development in Beijing: An analysis of consumer purchase intention’, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd, 216, pp. 361–372. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.231.
Jing, P., Zha, Y. and Pan, K. (2023) ‘Investigating Multidimensional Factors Influencing Switching Intention on School Bus among Chinese Parents — A Push – Pull – Mooring Framework’, Sustainability, 15(1), pp. 1–24.
Julian, L. and Napitupulu, N. (2020) ‘Perubahan Perilaku Pengguna M-Wallet terhadap M-Wallet lainnya Menggunakan Push-Pull-Mooring (PPM) Framework’, Kajian Branding Indonesia, 2(2), pp. 269–299. doi: 10.21632/kbi.2.2.269-299.
Kim, S., Choi, M. J. and Choi, J. S. (2020) ‘Empirical study on the factors affecting individuals’ switching intention to augmented/virtual reality content services based on push-pull-mooring theory’, Information (Switzerland), 11(1). doi: 10.3390/info11010025.
Kumar, S. and Chauhan, V. (2024) ‘Empowering Indian consumers to embrace electric vehicles through the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology’, The Scientific Temper, 15(3), pp. 2819–2832. doi: 10.58414/SCIENTIFICTEMPER.2024.15.3.52.
Lenz, J. and Bozakov, Z. (2023) ‘Why people replace their aging smart devices : A push – pull – mooring perspective’, Computers & Security. Elsevier Ltd, 130, p. 103258. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2023.103258.
Liao, Y. W. and Huang, Y. M. (2019) ‘Exploring the switching intention of learners on social network-based learning platforms: A perspective of the push-pull-mooring model’, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(9). doi: 10.29333/ejmste/108483.
Lin, K. Y., Wang, Y. T. and Huang, T. K. (2020) ‘Exploring the antecedents of mobile payment service usage: Perspectives based on cost–benefit theory, perceived value, and social influences’, Online Information Review, 44(1), pp. 299–318. doi: 10.1108/OIR-05-2018-0175.
Lin, X. and Wu, R. (2021) ‘An Empirical Study on the Dairy Product Consumers ’ Intention to Adopt the Food Traceability ’ s Technology : Push-Pull-Mooring Model Integrated by D & M ISS Model and TPB With ITM’, Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612889.
Malik, S., Chadhar, M. and Chetty, M. (2021) ‘Factors affecting the organizational adoption of blockchain technology: An Australian perspective’, Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2020–Janua, pp. 5597–5606. doi: 10.24251/hicss.2021.680.
Mashahadi, F., Mahmod, R. and Saidon, J. (2023) ‘Development in Electric Vehicle Intention and Adoption: Integrating the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Religiosity’, Information Management and Business Review (ISSN, 15(3), pp. 173–182.
Permana, R., Yulianti, E. and Wulandari, P. (2023) ‘Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi konsumen terhadap purchase intention kendaraan listrik di indonesia’, INOBIS: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis dan Manajemen Indonesia, 6(2), pp. 217–232.
Rotaris, L., Giansoldati, M. and Scorrano, M. (2021) ‘The slow uptake of electric cars in Italy and Slovenia. Evidence from a stated-preference survey and the role of knowledge and environmental awareness’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. Elsevier Ltd, 144(November 2020), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.11.011.
Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. (2016) Research Methods for Business. Seventh. Edited by J. Wiley. West Sussex, United Kingdom: Wiley. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_102084.
Shah, S. K. and Zhongjun, T. (2021) ‘Consumer’s intention to purchase 5G: Do environmental awareness, environmental knowledge and health consciousness attitude matter?’, Technology in Society. Elsevier Ltd, 65(March), p. 101563. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101563.
Shahzad, M. and Qu, Y. (2022) ‘Adoption of green innovation technology to accelerate sustainable development among manufacturing industry’, Journal of Innovation and Knowledge. Elsevier Espana, S.L., 7(4), p. 100231. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100231.
Singh, V., Singh, V. and Vaibhav, S. (2020) ‘A review and simple meta-analysis of factors influencing adoption of electric vehicles’, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. Elsevier, 86(August), p. 102436. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102436.
Siskawati, D. and Dirgahayani, P. (2024) ‘Gamification: Strategy to Pull the Intention of DKI Jakarta Residents (Choice User) to Use Public Transportation’, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ilmu Teknik, 9(1), pp. 1–16.
Sommestad, T. and Karlzén, H. (2017) ‘The Theory of Planned Behavior and Information Security Policy Compliance The Theory of Planned Behavior and Information Security Policy Compliance’, Journal of Computer Information Systems. Taylor & Francis, 00(00), pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1080/08874417.2017.1368421.
Sutopo, W., Hisjam, M. and Wicaksono, H. (2024) ‘Transportation Research Part F : Psychology and Behaviour Exploring the determinants of intention to purchase electric Motorcycles : The role of national culture in the UTAUT’, Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour. Elsevier Ltd, 100(December 2023), pp. 475–492. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2023.12.012.
Tang, Z. and Chen, L. (2020) ‘An empirical study of brand microblog users ’ unfollowing motivations : The perspective of push-pull-mooring model’, International Journal of Information Management. Elsevier, 1(1), p. 102066. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102066.
Wang, S., Wang, J. and Yang, F. (2020) ‘From willingness to action : Do push-pull-mooring factors matter for shifting to green transportation?’, Transportation Research Part D. Elsevier, 79(96), p. 102242. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102242.
Wijayanti, R. F. and Kusumawardhani, N. I. (2023) ‘Push, Pull, and Mooring Effects on E-Commerce Customer Switching Intention’, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 6(8), pp. 3820–3826. doi: 10.47191/ijmra/v6-i8-55.
Won, J. Y. and Park, M. J. (2020) ‘Smart factory adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises: Empirical evidence of manufacturing industry in Korea’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Elsevier, 157(May), p. 120117. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120117.
Xu, G., Wang, S. and Zhao, D. (2021) ‘Transition to sustainable transport : understanding the antecedents of consumer ’ s intention to adopt electric vehicles from the emotional research perspective’, Environmental Science and Pollution Research. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, pp. 20362–20374.
Yoon, C. and Lim, D. (2021) ‘Customers ’ Intentions to Switch to Internet-Only Banks : Perspective of the Push-Pull-Mooring Model’, Sustainability, 13(1), pp. 1–20.
Yuen, K. F., Huyen, D. T. K. and Wang, X. (2020) ‘Factors influencing the adoption of shared autonomous vehicles’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), pp. 1–16. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134868.
Zhao, Q. and Chen, C. (2022) ‘Factors Influencing Consumers ’ Intentions to Switch to Live Commerce From Push-Pull-Mooring Perspective’, Journal of Global Information Management, 31(1), pp. 1–30. doi: 10.4018/JGIM.319972.
Zhou, T. and Mi, Q. (2024) ‘Examining user switching between social Q & A platforms : a push – pull ‑ mooring perspective’, Universal Access in the Information Society. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 23(3), pp. 1333–1342. doi: 10.1007/s10209-023-01001-1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Prawherti Nugroho, Michael Halim, Herdian Agus Wistianto, Elfindah Princes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright :
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
- The author acknowledges that the GIJEA has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at GIJEA.
