The influence of Diversity, Inclusion, and People Development (DIP) on ESG performance in conventional banking

Authors

  • Shooma Fikri Albaasith Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia
  • Nurika Restuningdiah Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia
  • Triadi Agung Sudarto Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijea.v3i4.690

Keywords:

Diversity, Inclusion, People Development, ESG, Conventional Banking

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of Diversity, Inclusion, and People Development (DIP) on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance in the conventional banking sector in Indonesia during the 2021–2023 period. Based on Stakeholder Theory, this study argues that a bank's success is not only measured by profitability, but also by its ability to accommodate the interests of employees and communities through robust DIP practices. Using an explanatory quantitative method with a purposive sampling technique, this study involved 24 conventional banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, resulting in a total of 72 observation units analyzed using multiple linear regression. The results of the hypothesis testing indicate that the Diversity and People Development variables have a positive and significant influence on ESG performance, confirming that diverse perspectives and investment in human capital development are key pillars in strengthening corporate sustainability. Conversely, the Inclusion variable was found to have a negative and significant influence on ESG performance, indicating strategic inefficiency where current inclusion policies are still considered an operational burden that increases costs without providing direct returns on ESG scores. This study concludes that although HR development has become a mature industry standard, banks need to re-evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of inclusion policies so that they can create sustainable strategic value and not just become an administrative formality.

References

Al Shbail, Mohannad Obeid, Hashem Alshurafat, Waed Ensour, Hamzeh Al Amosh, dan Huthaifa Al-Hazaima. 2025. “Exploring the Impact of Internal CSR on Auditor Turnover Intentions: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Job Satisfaction, Organisational Commitment, and Job Complexity.” Acta Psychologica 256 (Juni):105012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105012.

Al-Shaer, H. (2020). Sustainability reporting quality and post-audit financial reporting quality: Empirical evidence from the UK. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2355–2373. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2

Al-Shaer, H., & Zaman, M. (2016). Board gender diversity and sustainability reporting quality. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 12(3), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2016.09.0

Alam, Md Kausar, dan Muhammad Shahin Miah. 2024. “Do Islamic Banks Use Institutional Theory in the Light of Shariah Governance? Empirical Evidence from a Muslim Dominant Country.” Heliyon 10 (2): e24252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24252.

Chen, Che, Song Chen, dan Dingwen Wu. 2025. “The Impact of ESG Performance on R&D Investment Stability: Evidence from China.” International Review of Economics & Finance 99 (April):104046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104046.

Citterio, Alberto, dan Timothy King. 2023. “The Role of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) in Predicting Bank Financial Distress.” Finance Research Letters 51 (Januari):103411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103411.

Da Silva, Paulo Pereira, dan Isabel Vieira. 2025. “ESG Disclosure and Labour Investment Efficiency.” Research in Economics 79 (3): 101060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2025.101060.

Galletta, S., Mazzù, S., Naciti, V., & Vermiglio, C. (2022). Gender diversity and sustainability performance in the banking industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2191

Galema, Rients, dan Dirk Gerritsen. 2025. “ESG Rating Changes and Stock Returns.” Journal of International Money and Finance 154 (April):103309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2025.103309.

Issa, Saheed Olanrewaju, Abdulkadri Toyin Alabi, dan Abdulbaki Teniola Ubandawaki. 2025. “Climate Change Governance, Shariah Governance Quality, and Financed Emission Mitigation: Evidence from Islamic Banks in Southeast and West Asia.” Borsa Istanbul Review, April, S2214845025000560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2025.03.011.

Kachkar, O., & Yilmaz, M. K. (2023). How diverse are Shariah supervisory boards of islamic banks? A global empirical survey. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 39(2), 312–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-10-2021-0195

Menicucci, Elisa, dan Guido Paolucci. 2023. “ESG Dimensions and Bank Performance: An Empirical Investigation in Italy.” Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 23 (3): 563–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0094.

Mergaliyev, A., Asutay, M., Avdukic, A., & Karbhari, Y. (2021). Higher ethical objective (maqasid al-shari’ah) augmented framework for islamic banks: Assessing ethical performance and exploring its determinants. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(Nomor 4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04331-4. Springer Netherlands

McKinsey & Company. (2023). Diversity matters even more: The case for holistic impact. Diakses dari https://www.mckinsey.com/

Mukhibad, Hasan, Doddy Setiawan, Y. Anni Aryani, dan Falikhatun Falikhatun. 2024. “Cognitive Board Diversity and Profitability – Evidence from Islamic Banks in Southeast Asia.” Asian Journal of Accounting Research 9 (3): 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-02-2023-0034.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021). Roadmap Keuangan Berkelanjutan Tahap II (2021-2025). Jakarta: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017 tentang Penerapan Keuangan Berkelanjutan bagi Lembaga Jasa Keuangan, Emiten, dan Perusahaan Publik. Jakarta: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.

Palmieri, Egidio, Greta Benedetta Ferilli, Yener Altunbas, Valeria Stefanelli, dan Enrico Fioravante Geretto. 2024. “Business Model and ESG Pillars: The Impacts on Banking Default Risk.” International Review of Financial Analysis 91 (Januari):102978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102978.

Paolone, Francesco, Matteo Pozzoli, Meghna Chhabra, dan Assunta Di Vaio. 2024a. “Cultural and Gender Diversity for ESG Performance towards Knowledge Sharing: Empirical Evidence from European Banks.” Journal of Knowledge Management 28 (11): 106–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2023-0445.

Shrestha, Chaman, Panagiotis Andrikopoulos, dan Jin Suk Park. 2025. “ESG Rating and Financial Performance in the Emerging Markets: The Moderating Effects of Cross-Listing and Industry Type.” Research in International Business and Finance 77 (Mei):102916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102916.

Tumewang, Yunice Karina, Kemala Putri Ayunda, Maudi Rahmah Azzahra, dan M. Kabir Hassan. 2024. “The Effects of Diversity and Inclusion on ESG Performance: A Comparison between Islamic and Conventional Banks.” Borsa Istanbul Review 24 (6): 1101–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2024.10.001.

Wong, S. L. (2023). The impact of female representation and ethnic diversity in committees on environmental, social and governance performance in Malaysia. Society and Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-02-2023-0052

Yadav, P., & Prashar, A. (2023). Board gender diversity: Implications for environment, social, and governance (ESG) performance of Indian firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(9), 2654–2673. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2021-0689.

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Albaasith, S. F., Restuningdiah, N., & Sudarto, T. A. (2025). The influence of Diversity, Inclusion, and People Development (DIP) on ESG performance in conventional banking. Greenation International Journal of Economics and Accounting, 3(4), 651–658. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijea.v3i4.690