Evaluation of Linear Regression and Ridge Regression as Baselines for Predicting Indonesia's CO₂ Emissions

Authors

  • I Putu Santrisna Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia
  • Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia
  • I Made Gede Sunarya Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijes.v4i2.1217

Keywords:

CO₂ emissions, Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, Prediction

Abstract

Indonesia's annual CO₂ emissions have increased alongside economic growth and rising energy demand, making short-term prediction relevant for environmental planning. This study evaluates Linear Regression and Ridge Regression as transparent baseline models for predicting Indonesia's total annual CO₂ emissions using public data from Our World in Data for 1990–2022. The predictors are GDP per capita, primary energy consumption, and population. The data were split chronologically, with 1990–2015 as training data and 2016–2022 as test data. Ridge Regression used standardized predictors, and its alpha parameter was selected on the training period using TimeSeriesSplit. Model performance was evaluated using MAE, RMSE, and R², and was compared with Naive Forecast and Linear Trend baselines. Linear Regression achieved the best performance on the test data with MAE of 19.181, RMSE of 21.384, and R² of 0.887. Ridge Regression produced MAE of 27.693, RMSE of 33.758, and R² of 0.719, while still outperforming the simple baselines. These results indicate that although regularization is theoretically motivated under multicollinearity, it did not improve, and in this case reduced, out-of-sample accuracy on a small annual dataset. The findings should be interpreted as predictive performance rather than causal relationships.

References

Ajala, A. A., Adeoye, O. L., Salami, O. M., & Jimoh, A. Y. (2025). An examination of daily CO2 emissions prediction through a comparative analysis of machine learning, deep learning, and statistical models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32, 2510–2535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35764-8

Akhtar, N., Alharthi, M. F., & Khan, M. S. (2024). Mitigating Multicollinearity in Regression: A Study on Improved Ridge Estimators. Mathematics, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12193027

Alharthi, M. F., & Akhtar, N. (2025). Modified Two-Parameter Ridge Estimators for Enhanced Regression Performance in the Presence of Multicollinearity: Simulations and Medical Data Applications. Axioms, 14, 527. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14070527

Begum, A. M., & Al Mobin, M. (2025). A machine learning approach to carbon emissions prediction of the top eleven emitters by 2030 and their prospects for meeting Paris agreement targets. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04236-5

Cai, Y., Feng, J., Wang, Y., Ding, Y., Hu, Y., & Fang, H. (2024). The Optuna–LightGBM–XGBoost Model: A Novel Approach for Estimating Carbon Emissions Based on the Electricity–Carbon Nexus. Applied Sciences, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114632

Chicco, D., Warrens, M. J., & Jurman, G. (2021). The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ-CS.623

Costantini, L., Laio, F., Mariani, M. S., Ridolfi, L., & Sciarra, C. (2024). Forecasting national CO2 emissions worldwide. Scientific Reports, 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73060-0

Foong, L. K., Blazek, V., Prokop, L., Misak, S., Atamurotov, F., & Khalilpoor, N. (2024). Improve carbon dioxide emission prediction in the Asia and Oceania (OECD): nature-inspired optimisation algorithms versus conventional machine learning. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2024.2391988

Gurcan, F. (2024). Forecasting CO2 emissions of fuel vehicles for an ecological world using ensemble learning, machine learning, and deep learning models. PeerJ Computer Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ-CS.2234

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7

Hoerl, A. E., & Kennard, R. W. (1970). Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems. Technometrics, 12, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634

IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647

Kapoor, S., & Narayanan, A. (2023). Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science. Patterns, 4(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100804

Karakurt, I., & Aydin, G. (2023). Development of regression models to forecast the CO2 emissions from fossil fuels in the BRICS and MINT countries. Energy, 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125650

Kumari, S., & Singh, S. K. (2022). Machine learning-based time series models for effective CO2 emission prediction in India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(55), 116601–116616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21723-8

Kurniawan, R., Kautsar, S., Wahyuni, R. N. T., Gio, P. U., Wongsonadi, S. K., Zubaidi, M., & Andayani, F. (2025). Assessing economic and social determinants of carbon emissions towards sustainable development in West Java, Indonesia. Carbon Research, 4, 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-025-00200-0

Lei, Q., Yu, H., & Lin, Z. (2024). Understanding China’s CO2 emission drivers: Insights from random forest analysis and remote sensing data. Heliyon, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29086

Luqman, M., Bhatti, S. H., Aydin, D., & Jamil, M. (2025). Addressing multicollinearity in general linear model: A novel approach for ridge parameter with performance comparison. PLoS ONE, 20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335072

Magklaras, A., Gogos, C., Alefragis, P., & Birbas, A. (2024). Enhancing Parameters Tuning of Overlay Models with Ridge Regression: Addressing Multicollinearity in High-Dimensional Data. Mathematics, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12203179

Ponce, B. J. H., & Manlangit, A. T. (2023). Carbon dioxide emissions and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: evidence from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 100037–100045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29370-3

Resosudarmo, B. P., Rezki, J. F., & Effendi, Y. (2023). Prospects of Energy Transition in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 59, 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2023.2238336

Ritchie, H., Rosado, P., & Roser, M. (2026). CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions

Shaheen, N., Shah, I., Almohaimeed, A., Ali, S., & Alqifari, H. N. (2023). Some Modified Ridge Estimators for Handling the Multicollinearity Problem. Mathematics, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/math11112522

Sujon, K. M., Hassan, R. B., Towshi, Z. T., Othman, M. A., Samad, M. A., & Choi, K. (2024). When to Use Standardization and Normalization: Empirical Evidence from Machine Learning Models and XAI. IEEE Access, 12, 135300–135314. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3462434

Wahyudi, H., Gunarto, T., Ciptawaty, U., Aida, N., Yunita, R., & Putri, R. M. (2024). The Influence of Determinats on CO2 Emission in Indonesia for a Decade. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.15132

Published

2026-07-23

How to Cite

Santrisna, I. P., Divayana, D. G. H., & Sunarya, I. M. G. (2026). Evaluation of Linear Regression and Ridge Regression as Baselines for Predicting Indonesia’s CO₂ Emissions. Greenation International Journal of Engineering Science, 4(2), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijes.v4i2.1217