Designing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Evaluating Sales Performance and Distribution Systems in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Sector Using the Balanced Scorecard and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Methods at PT X

Authors

  • Muhammad Fadril Sonaska Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Riau Island, Indonesia
  • Hery Irwan Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Riau Island, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijes.v4i2.1228

Keywords:

Balanced Scorecard, Analytical Hierarchy Process, Key Performance Indicator, Sales Performance, FMCG Distribution

Abstract

The Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) industry requires companies to maintain high operational efficiency, effective sales performance, and reliable distribution systems to sustain competitiveness in an increasingly dynamic market. PT X currently evaluates sales performance primarily based on sales achievement, while other strategic aspects, including customer satisfaction, distribution effectiveness, internal business processes, and employee capability development, have not been comprehensively measured. This condition limits management's ability to evaluate organizational performance holistically and identify strategic improvement priorities. Therefore, this study aims to design Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for evaluating sales and distribution performance using the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) method and determine KPI priorities through the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). This research employed a quantitative descriptive approach involving interviews, observations, company document analysis, and expert judgment from sales managers, distribution managers, and logistics supervisors. The Balanced Scorecard was utilized to formulate strategic objectives and performance indicators based on four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business processes, and learning and growth. Furthermore, AHP was applied to determine the priority weights of each perspective and KPI through pairwise comparison matrices. The study identified twenty-four KPIs distributed across the four Balanced Scorecard perspectives. The AHP results indicated that the Financial Perspective received the highest priority weight (0.39), followed by Customer (0.28), Internal Business Process (0.20), and Learning and Growth (0.13). The highest-priority KPIs include Sales Achievement, On-Time Delivery, Fill Rate, Customer Retention Rate, and Distribution Cost Ratio. The proposed KPI system provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating organizational performance and supporting strategic decision-making to improve sales effectiveness and distribution efficiency in PT X.

References

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard—Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79. �

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press.

Kaplan, R. S. (2009). Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, 3, 1253–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1751-3243(07)03003-9⁠�

sciencedirect.com

Saaty, T. L. (2005). Analytic Hierarchy Process. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470011815.b2a4a002⁠�

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Saaty, T. L. (1987). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: What and How It Is Used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176.

Ho, W. (2008). Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Applications: A Literature Review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 211–228.

Ho, W., & Ma, X. (2018). The State-of-the-Art Integrations and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(2), 399–414.

Yaghoobi, T., & Haddadi, F. (2016). Organizational Performance Measurement by Integrating Balanced Scorecard and AHP. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(7), 959–976. �

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Lee, A. H. I., Chen, W. C., & Chang, C. J. (2008). A Fuzzy AHP and Balanced Scorecard Approach for Evaluating Performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 96–107.

Pérez, C. A., Montequín, V. R., Fernández, F. O., & Balsera, J. V. (2017). Integrating AHP and BSC for Sustainable Business. Sustainability, 9(4), 486. �

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Kober, R., & Northcott, D. (2021). Testing Cause-and-Effect Relationships within a Balanced Scorecard. Accounting & Finance, 61, 1815–1849. �

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Rokhim, M. (2017). Penentuan Key Performance Indicator dengan Metode Balanced Scorecard. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 18(2), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol18.No2.168-175⁠�

ejournal.umm.ac.id

Damayanti, E. (2009). Perancangan Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja dengan Metode Balanced Scorecard. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 9(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol9.No2.169-177⁠�

ejournal.umm.ac.id

Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2020). Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management (13th ed.). Pearson.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research Methods for Business (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Published

2026-07-22

How to Cite

Sonaska, M. F., & Irwan, H. (2026). Designing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Evaluating Sales Performance and Distribution Systems in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Sector Using the Balanced Scorecard and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Methods at PT X. Greenation International Journal of Engineering Science, 4(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijes.v4i2.1228