Comparative Analysis of Shoe Size Standards Based on Foot Measurement Methods: Evidence from Indonesian and International Standards
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/gijes.v4i2.1288Keywords:
shoe sizing, Indonesian National Standard, Mondopoint, standardization, footwear industryAbstract
The footwear industry is one of the strategic manufacturing sectors that contributes significantly to economic growth through employment, value creation, and export activities. Accurate shoe sizing is essential to ensure consumer comfort, product quality, and international market competitiveness. This study aimed to compare the Indonesian National Standard (SNI) shoe sizing system with major international sizing systems based on foot measurement methods, evaluate the regulatory implications of SNI implementation, and propose a harmonized sizing framework for the footwear industry. A descriptive comparative approach was employed through literature review, document analysis of national and international standards, comparative evaluation of shoe sizing systems, observation of foot measurement methods, and regulatory analysis. The results indicate that the SNI sizing system has a high level of compatibility with the Mondopoint system because both are based on actual foot length measured in millimeters. In contrast, the European Union, United Kingdom, and United States sizing systems use different numbering principles that require conversion. A Mondopoint-based dual-labeling approach is proposed to improve sizing accuracy, reduce product returns, facilitate international trade, and strengthen the competitiveness of Indonesian footwear products. These findings provide practical support for future footwear standardization policies and industrial implementation.
References
Anggoro, P. W., Wicaksono, A., Jamari, & Bayuseno, A. P. (2021). Reverse Engineering for Designing Insole Shoe Orthotics Leading an Accurate Dimensional Size for Patients with a Deformed Foot. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 16(2), 145–154.
Blind, K. (2004). The Economics of Standards: Theory, Evidence, Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Boppana, A., & Anderson, A. P. (2021). Dynamic Foot Morphology Explained Through 4D Scanning and Shape Modeling. Journal of Biomechanics, 122, 110465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110465
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Chang, H. Y., & Lee, W. Y. (2019). The Effect of Body Posture and Loading Condition on Foot Dimensions for Shoe Sizing. Applied Ergonomics, 80, 102915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102915
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Goonetilleke, R. S. (2012). The Science of Footwear. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b13021
Hawes, M. R., Sovak, E., Miyashita, T., Kang, S., Yoshihuku, T., & Tanaka, Y. (1994). Ethnic Differences in Forefoot Shape and the Determination of Shoe Comfort. Ergonomics, 37(1), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408963637
International Organization for Standardization. (2019). Footwear Sizing — Mondopoint System of Sizing and Marking. International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
International Organization for Standardization. (2023). Footwear — Sizing — Conversion of Sizing Systems. International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
International Organization for Standardization, & International Electrotechnical Commission. (2004). ISO/IEC Guide 2:2004: Standardization and Related Activities—General Vocabulary.
Kabir, M. A., Rahman, S. S., Islam, M. M., Ahmed, S., & Laird, C. (2021). Mobile Apps for Foot Measurement in Pedorthic Practice: Scoping Review. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 9(3), e24202. https://doi.org/10.2196/24202
Krauss, I., Grau, S., Mauch, M., Maiwald, C., & Horstmann, T. (2008). Sex-Related Differences in Foot Shape. Ergonomics, 51(11), 1693–1709. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802376026
Luximon, A., Goonetilleke, R. S., & Zhang, M. (2005). 3D Foot Shape Generation from 2D Information. Ergonomics, 48(6), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013050070970
Mauch, M., Krauss, I., Grau, S., & Horstmann, T. (2008). Foot Morphology of Healthy Children Aged 1 to 14 Years. Journal of Anatomy, 213(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00948.x
Menz, H. B., & Morris, M. E. (2005). Footwear Characteristics and Foot Problems in Older People. Gerontology, 51(5), 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1159/000086373
Nigg, B. M. (1986). Biomechanics of Running Shoes. Human Kinetics Publishers.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2014 tentang Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 34 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Standardisasi dan Penilaian Kesesuaian Nasional. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Pratikno, H., & Kusumawati, W. I. (2022). Menentukan Ukuran Sepatu Secara Realtime Melalui Segmentasi Citra Telapak Kaki. Journal of Computer, Electronic, and Telecommunication (COMPLETE), 3(1), 16–24.
Sikaroudi, A. M. E., Ghaffari, S., Yousefi, A., & Sadeghi Naeini, H. (2017). Foot Anthropometry Device and Single Object Image Thresholding. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1707.03004. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.03004
Swann, G. M. P. (2010). The Economics of Standardization: An Update. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).
Waluyono, G. F. (2020). Perancangan Sistem Ukuran Sepatu untuk Anak Perempuan Usia 4–6 Tahun Berdasarkan Data Antropometri Kaki. Jurnal Aplikasi Ilmu Teknik Industri (JAPTI), 1(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.32585/japti.v1i1.622
Wibowo, D. B., Haryadi, G. D., & Saputra, E. (2021). Pemindaian 3D Telapak Kaki dan Cara Menghasilkan Koordinat Konturnya untuk Keperluan Perancangan Sepatu Ortotik. Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin, 16(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.32497/jrm.v16i2.2435
Wunderlich, R. E., & Cavanagh, P. R. (2001). Gender Differences in Adult Foot Shape: Implications for Shoe Design. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 33(4), 605–611. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200104000-00015
Xiong, S., Zhao, J., Jiang, Z., & Dong, M. (2010). A Computer-Aided Design System for Foot-Feature-Based Shoe Last Customization. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 46(1–4), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2087-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wawan Budi Setyawan, Nurwantoro, Muhammad Asfan, Risang Pujianto, Totok Yulaidin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
- The author acknowledges that Greenation International Journal of Engineering Science (GIJES) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the distribution of non-exclusive manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in books, etc.), acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in GIJES.
























