Productivity Of Arabica Coffee Varieties Under Pine Trees

Authors

  • Dwi Wahyuni Faculty of Forestry, Winaya Mukti University, Indonesia
  • Aditya Sarif Hidayat Faculty of Forestry, Winaya Mukti University, Indonesia
  • Ina Darliana Faculty of Forestry, Winaya Mukti University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijtm.v1i4.140

Keywords:

Arabica Coffee Variety, Productivity, Intercropping

Abstract

The Community Forest Management (PHBM) program has attempted to increase soil productivity in forest areas by planting coffee under trees. The planting system used by Perhutani under PHBM is intercropping. This planting pattern aims to optimize the potential of land use for community welfare. This study aims to determine the Arabica coffee variety (Coffea arabica L.) with the highest productivity among pine stands at LMDH Campaka Bentang, Bandung Regency. The method used was experimental, with a completely randomized design (CRD) of five treatments with eight repetitions. The study was limited to five varieties of coffee plants grown by farmers with uniform coffee care or maintenance at the same planting date and in one plot. The results showed that the Ateng super variety had the highest average fruit weight per 100 seeds, the highest number of fruits, and the highest number of productive branches per tree, while the Ateng variety had the lowest value. The longest productive branch length per tree parameter was found in the Typica variety and the lowest in the Ateng variety. Further test results using Duncan's test with a 5% confidence level showed that the Ateng super variety had the highest value in the tested parameters compared to the other four varieties, while the lowest value was found in the Ateng variety.

References

Bote 2011. Effects Of Shade On Growth, Production And Quality Of Coffee (Coffea Arabica) In Ethiopia. Journal Of Horticulture And forestry 3 (11): 336 – 341.

Budiman H. 2012. Prospek Tinggi Bertanam Kopi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.

Ferry Y, Supriadi H, Ibrahim MSD. 2015. Teknologi budi daya tanaman kopi aplikasi pada perkebunan rakyat. Jakarta: IAARD Press

Firdaus MF, Ariffin. 2019. Karakteristik unsur lingkungan mikro pada tegakan hutan pinus (Pinus Merkusii Jungh) dan mahoni (Sweietenia Macrophylla King) di kawasan UB Forest. Jurnal Produksi Tanaman 7(3): 495 – 504.

Freitas AF, Nadaleti DHS, Silveira HRO, Carvalho GR, Venturin RP, Silva VA. 2020. Productivity and beverage sensory quality of arabica coffee intercropped with timber species. Pesq. agropec. bras., Brasília 55: e02240. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2020.v55.02240

Hapsari R, Indradewa D, Ambarwati D. 2017. Pengaruh pengurangan jumlah cabang pertumbuhan dan hasil tomat (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Vegetalika 6(3): 37 – 49.

Marisa H. 1990. Pengaruh Ekstrak Daun Pinus (Pinus merkusii Jungh. et de Vriese) terhadap Perkecambahan dan Pertumbuhan Vegetatif Tanaman Kedelai (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) [Tesis]. Institut Teknologi Bandung. Bandung.

Nurrochman, Trisnowati S, Muhartini S. 2013. Pengaruh pupuk kalium klorida dan umur penjarangan buah terhadap hasil dan mutu salak (Salacca zalacca (Gaertn.) Voss) ‘Pondoh Super’. Vegetalika 2(1): 3 – 12.

Rahardjo P. 2012. Kopi Panduan Budidaya dan Pengolahan Kopi Arabika dan Robusta. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.

Sobari L, Sakiroh, Purwanto EH. 2012. Pengaruh jenis tanaman penaung terhadap pertumbuhan dan persentase tanaman berbuah pada kopi arabika varietas kartika 1. Buletin RISTRI 3 (3): 217 – 222.

Utomo SB. 2011. Dinamika Suhu Udara Siang-Malam terhadap Fotorespirasi Fase Generatif Kopi Robusta di Bawah Naungan yang Berbeda pada Sistem Agroforestry [Tesis]. Universitas Jember. Jember.

Widiastuti L, Tohari, Sulistyaningsih E. 2004. Pengaruh intensitas cahaya dan kadar daminosida terhadap iklim mikro dan pertumbuhan tanaman krisan dalam pot. Ilmu Pertanian 11(2): 35 – 42.

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

Wahyuni, D., Aditya Sarif Hidayat, & Ina Darliana. (2024). Productivity Of Arabica Coffee Varieties Under Pine Trees. Greenation International Journal of Tourism and Management, 1(4), 447–451. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijtm.v1i4.140