Exploring Educational Diversity: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia with Europe and America

Authors

  • Hani Hasanah Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Muhamad Al Faruq Abdullah Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • R. Madhakomala Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijtm.v2i4.297

Keywords:

Education System, Comparative Study, Indonesia, Europe, America

Abstract

This study aims to analyze a comparative perspective of education systems in Indonesia, Europe, and America. The main focus is to identify differences in educational approaches, curriculum structures, teaching methods, and the challenges faced by Indonesia in enhancing its education quality and global competitiveness. A qualitative library research method was employed, reviewing literature related to the education systems of the three regions. The results show that Europe emphasizes equitable access, flexibility, and competency-based education tailored to local needs. In contrast, the United States adopts a decentralized system, encouraging student freedom in course selection and non-academic skill development through extracurricular activities. Meanwhile, Indonesia applies a more centralized curriculum focusing on uniformity and cultural-moral values. Indonesia’s main challenges include achieving equitable access to quality education, improving teacher capacity, and integrating technology into learning processes. This conclusions represent that Indonesia can adopt best practices from Europe and America, such as curriculum flexibility, competency-based approaches, and technology utilization, to create a more innovative and inclusive education system.

References

Andriana, A., & Eliza, D. (2021). Perbandingan pendidikan di Indonesia dan pendidikan di Finlandia. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 4, 828–833.

Dananjaya, U. (2023). Media pembelajaran aktif. Nuansa Cendekia.

Deissinger, T. (2010). Vocational education and training - VET system.

Frackmann, E., & De Weert, E. (1994). Higher education policy in Germany. In L. Goedegebuure, F. Kaiser, P. Maassen, L. Meek, F. van Vught, & E. de Weert (Eds.), Higher education policy: An international comparative perspective (pp. 132–161). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042393-7.50013-4

Heath, R. D., Anderson, C., Turner, A. C., & Payne, C. M. (2022). Extracurricular activities and disadvantaged youth: A complicated—but promising—story. Urban Education, 57(8), 1415–1449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918805797

Kemendikbudristek. (2020). Kurikulum nasional: Panduan implementasi dan pengembangan. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Levin, B. (2012). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. McGraw-Hill Education.

Martínez-Martín, J. E., Mariñoso, P. E., Rosado-González, E. M., Paz, A., & Sá, A. A. (2024). Assessment of educational potential in Arouca and Estrela UNESCO Global Geoparks (Portugal) for multi-level students and teachers. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 12(4), 517–530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.11.002

Montanesa, D., & Firman, F. (2021). Perbandingan sistem pendidikan Indonesia dan Jepang. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i1.246

Qinhua, Z., Dongming, M., & Zhiying, N. (2022). Adult Competencies for Lifelong Learning. River Publishers. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=1fiGEAAAQBAJ

Rofi’ah, F. A., Nihayatuzzain, B., Fathoni, H. D., & Zuhriyah, I. A. (2023). Komparasi sistematika dan budaya evaluasi pembelajaran pada lembaga pendidikan secara komprehensif di negara Finlandia dan Indonesia. Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 1(3), 337–363. https://doi.org/10.59966/pandu.v1i3.470

Tikkinen, S., Korkeamäki, R.-L., & Dreher, M. J. (2020). Finnish teachers and librarians in curriculum reform. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101615

UNESCO. (2021). Global Education Monitoring Report: Education for All by 2030. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Wang, T. (2019). Competence for Students’ Future: Curriculum Change and Policy Redesign in China. ECNU Review of Education, 2(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119850905

Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2018). An overview of e-learning in China: History, challenges and opportunities. Research in Comparative and International Education, 13(1), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499918763421

Winarso, H., Imamuddina, B., Wibisono, B. H., Anwar, C., Nurwardani, P., Kuswandi, S., Soelaiman, F., Djawad, I. M., Rubiyanto, A., Rusdi, Lukman, F., Widjajanto, W. D., Akhlus, S., Ismunandar, & Yunardi. (2014). Sistem Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah di 16 Negara. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/

Published

2024-12-29

How to Cite

Hasanah, H., Al Faruq Abdullah, M., & Madhakomala, R. (2024). Exploring Educational Diversity: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia with Europe and America. Greenation International Journal of Tourism and Management, 2(4), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijtm.v2i4.297