SDGs Trade-off on Online Transportation: A Systematic Review of the Environmental, Social, and Economic Impacts of Ride-Hailing and Mobility as a Service (MaaS)

Authors

  • Yuwono Dwisilo Sucipto Institute of Transportation and Logistics Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Idris Gautama So Universitas Bina Nusantara, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Aang Gunawan Institute of Transportation and Logistics Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Devi Marlita Institute of Transportation and Logistics Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.1129

Keywords:

Ride-hailing, MaaS, SDGs, Trade-off, Environment, Social, Economy, Gig Economy, Sustainable Transportation

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has given birth to the phenomenon of ride-hailing and Mobility as a Service (MaaS) which promises the efficiency of urban mobility. However, the contribution of these services to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is still a debate due to the trade-off phenomenon between the pillars of sustainability. This study used the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method on 572 articles sourced from the Scopus database. The results of the analysis show that although economically these services increase revenues (SDG 8), there is a significant negative impact on the environmental pillar (SDG 13) due to the shift from public transportation and the deadheading phenomenon. In addition, there is a tug-of-war between social and economic pillars which is reflected in the working conditions of gig economy drivers. The discussion highlighted the need for integrated regulations to minimize conflicts of interest between the pillars of the SDGs, including MaaS integration, electric vehicle adoption, and workforce protection.

References

Bai, J., Xiong, Y., & Liang, X. (2025). Examining Emerging Risks of Vehicle Electrification in Emergency Medical Transport. Risk Analysis, 45(12), 4947–4962. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70148

Beza, A. D., Demissie, M. G., & Kattan, L. (2025). A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Shared Micromobility Trips in First- and Last- Mile Public Transit Integration. 2679(11), 762–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981251350652

Chen, S. (2025). Pollution and Carbon Emission Reduction Effects of Transit Metropolis Construction : Evidence from China.

Csikor, D. (2026). Ride-sharing services in regional context : consumer attitudes and reuse intentions in western Hungary.

Du, R., Kurauchi, F., & Nakamura, T. (2025). Assessing Regional Public Transport Evaluation Indicators for Advanced Mobility Systems: A Review. 1–37.

Esser, P., Pigera, S., Campbell, M., Schaik, P. Van, & Crosbie, T. (2025). Success Factors in Transport Interventions: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review ( 1990 – 2022 ).

Fale, M., Wang, Y., Rupnik, B., Kramberger, T., & Vizinger, T. (2025). Systematic Review of Transportation Choice Modeling. 1–36.

Gu, X., & Liu, X. (2025). Exploring Differences in Daily Travel Patterns of Traditional and Ride-hailing Taxis Via Spatial-temporal OD Data : A Case.

Hazra, U., Priyo, A. K. K., & Sheikh, J. J. (2024). Understanding Experiences Of adverse Digital Incorporation Of ridesharing Drivers in Bangladesh. Information Technology and People, 38(5), 2357–2380. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-01-2024-0027

Jin, Fujie, Cheng, Yuan, Li, Xitong, & Hu, Yu Jeffrey. (2024). Connecting the Last Mile: The Impact of Dockless Bike-sharing on Public Transportation. Production and Operations Management, 34(12), 3904–3919. https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478231224953

Kriswardhana, W., & Kiss, D. E. (2025). Identifying latent mobility as a service preference segments among college students. European Transport Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-025-00719-8

Li, J., Xu, X., Xu, H., & Song, Y. (2025). Measuring customer-perceived service quality in the ride-hailing industry: a generic approach for the development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1570. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05902-9

Li, X., Wang, G., Zhu, Y., & Liu, W. (2025). A System dynamics-based simulation study on urban traffic congestion mitigation and emission reduction policies.

Liyanage, S., Dia, H., & Duncan, G. (2026). AI-Powered Evaluation of On-Demand Public Transport: A Hybrid Simulation Approach. 1–32.

Luiza, M., Fonseca, F., Rodrigues, D., Ribeiro, P. J. G., & Nakata-osaki, C. M. (2025). Combining Resilience and Sustainability in Urban Mobility : A Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis. 1–31.

Mallett, R. (2026). The flat-formalisation fallacy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X251374649

Naranjo, D., Gonzalez, J. N., Garrido, L., & Vassallo, J. M. (2025). Technologies for New Mobility Services : Opportunities and Challenges from the Perspective of Stakeholders.

On, B., & Feedback, P. (2025). Co-governance of online car-hailing operation based on passenger feedback.

Reinhardt, J., Alam, A., & Legacy, C. (2026). Children's Independent Mobility : A Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.70061

Rizki, M., Basuki, T., & Yusak, J. (2025). The influence of app function evolution on transport SuperApp use behaviour over time. In Transportation. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10485-6

Rouky, N., Benmoussa, O., Fri, M., & Abourraja, M. N. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Applications for Smart and Sustainable Mobility as a Service Concept: A Systematic Literature Review. 1–28.

Sáenz‐Leandro, R. (2026). The Long and Winding Road: Policy Frictions and the Governance of Ride‐Hailing Platforms in Latin America. Latin American Policy, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.70039

Shehabeldeen, A. (2026). Factors Influencing Electric Vehicle Adoption : Coupling Machine Learning Models and Open-Source Data. 2680(2), 948–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981251368317

Shou, J., Li, W., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Skitmore, M., Wang, W., Yao, W., & Zhang, C. (2026). Identifying Critical Drivers of Transportation Carbon Emissions: An Integrated DEMATEL-Random Forest Approach. 1–29.

Vu, T. D., Nguyễn, B., Vu, P. T., Nguyen, T. M. N., & Hoang, C. C. (2024). Promoting Customer Satisfaction and Reuse Intention Using Ride-Hailing Taxi Services: Role Of consumer Perceived Value, Personal Innovativeness And corporate Image. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 17(4), 1021–1047. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjba-11-2023-0570

Wang, M., Du, M., Li, X., & Yang, J. (2025). Driving Sustainable Mobility : Adoption and the Willingness to Participate in Electric Ride-Hailing Service Among Driver Groups in Less-Developed Cities. 1–26.

Zhang, Y., Xia, X., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Mobilities in the Heat : Identifying Travel-Related Urban Heat Exposure and Its Built Environment Drivers Using Remote Sensing and Mobility Data in Chengdu , China.

Published

2026-08-23

How to Cite

Sucipto, Y. D., So, I. G., Gunawan, A., & Marlita, D. (2026). SDGs Trade-off on Online Transportation: A Systematic Review of the Environmental, Social, and Economic Impacts of Ride-Hailing and Mobility as a Service (MaaS). Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 4(3), 902–915. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.1129