Regulation and Implications of the Electronic Notary and Remote Notary Concepts under Indonesian Positive Law

Authors

  • Rahayu Sri Utami Universitas Maarif Hasyim Latief, Jawa Timur, Indonesia.
  • Yesi Rahman Sari Universitas Maarif Hasyim Latief, Jawa Timur, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.1202

Keywords:

Electronic Notary, Remote Notary, Legal Certainty, Notarial Digitalization

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has encouraged the digitalization of legal services, including notarial practice through the concepts of electronic notary and remote notary. This study aims to analyze the regulation of these concepts within the Indonesian legal system and examine their implications for legal certainty, deed authenticity, personal data protection, and notarial practice. This research employed a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively. The results indicate that neither the electronic notary nor the remote notary has a comprehensive legal basis in Indonesia. Existing regulations continue to require the physical presence of the parties, direct reading of the deed, and handwritten signatures as essential elements of an authentic notarial deed. Although electronic documents are generally recognized under Indonesian law, notarial deeds remain excluded from such recognition. Consequently, deeds executed electronically risk losing their status as authentic deeds and may create legal uncertainty. This study concludes that implementing electronic and remote notary services requires amendments to the Law on Notary Position and the formulation of clear technical regulations that accommodate technological developments while preserving the authenticity of deeds and ensuring legal protection for all parties.

References

Adjie, H. (2009). Hukum notaris Indonesia (Tafsir tematik terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris). Refika Aditama.

Alkatiri, N. M. (2021). Perbandingan tugas dan wewenang notaris Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat. Tanah Air Beta.

Gafar, A. (2008). Penggunaan internet sebagai media baru dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 8(2), 3.

Kie, T. T. (2005). Studi notariat: Serba-serbi praktik notaris. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.

Kie, T. T. (2007). Serba-serbi ilmu kenotariatan. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.

Latumente, P. E. (2011). Cacat yuridis akta notaris dalam peristiwa hukum konkret dan implikasi hukumnya. Tuna Press.

Marbun, L. (2020). Transaksi jual-beli melalui media internet dikaitkan dengan alat bukti tertulis (surat) ditinjau dari segi hukum acara perdata dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008. Jurnal Humano, 4(2), 78.

Mido, M. T. C. (2018). Tanggung jawab notaris pada akta yang dibacakan oleh staf notaris di hadapan penghadap. Jurnal Lentera Hukum, 5(1), 77.

Nurliyantika, R. (2022). Studi komparasi tugas dan wewenang notaris di Indonesia dan Malaysia. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 11(2), 197.

Purbo, O. W. (2006). Internet wireless & hotspot. Media Komputindo.

Purnamasari, S. A. (2020). Pembuatan akta notaris secara elektronik berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris dan Undang-Undang ITE. Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram. 1(2), 10.

Saputro, A. D. (2010). Jati diri notaris Indonesia: Dulu, sekarang, dan di masa datang. Gramedia Pustaka.

Sitompul, J. (2012). Cyberspace, cybercrime, cyberlaw. Tatanusa.

Sulihandari, H., & Rafiani, N. (2013). Prinsip-prinsip dasar profesi notaris. Dunia Cerdas.

Tobing, R. D. (2012). Aspek-aspek hukum bisnis: Pengertian, asas, teori dan praktik. Lasbang Justia.

Tutik, T. T. (2014). Hukum perdata dalam sistem hukum nasional. Media Group.

Published

2026-07-25

How to Cite

Utami, R. S., & Sari, Y. R. (2026). Regulation and Implications of the Electronic Notary and Remote Notary Concepts under Indonesian Positive Law. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 4(3), 720–733. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.1202