Beyond Cultural Preservation: Legal Protection of Tapis Lampung as a Creative Economy Asset through Geographical Indications

Authors

  • Melisa Safitri Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
  • Rahmi Jened Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
  • Agung Sujatmiko Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i5.898

Keywords:

Tapis Lampung, geographical indications, Creative Economy, legal protection, geographically based products

Abstract

This study examines the transformation of Tapis Lampung from a traditional cultural expression into a geographically based creative economy product and its legal implications within the Geographical Indications framework. The issue addressed arises from the limitations of cultural preservation approaches, which have not provided adequate protection for economic value, reputation, and the use of geographical names in commercial activities. This study aims to analyze the characteristics of Tapis Lampung that reflect the linkage between product, geographical origin, and producer community, as well as to formulate a legal protection model through the Geographical Indications regime. The research employs a normative legal method using statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that Tapis Lampung demonstrates a strong normative basis for Geographical Indication protection, particularly in terms of reputation, distinctive characteristics, and geographical linkage through human factors. Furthermore, Geographical Indications provide a mechanism for collective control over the use of geographical names and for the establishment and supervision of verifiable quality standards, thereby enhancing economic value within the creative economy framework.. Therefore, the application of the Geographical Indications regime constitutes a strategic measure to ensure legal protection as well as the economic and cultural sustainability of Tapis Lampung.

Author Biographies

Rahmi Jened, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Rahmi Jened is a Professor of Intellectual Property Law at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia. Her research focuses on intellectual property law, geographical indications.

Agung Sujatmiko, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Agung Sujatmiko is a lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia. His research interests include intellectual property law, business law, and legal aspects of innovation and economic development.

References

Barham, E. (2003). Translating terroir: The global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00052-9

Belletti, G., & Marescotti, A. (2011). Origin products, geographical indications and rural development. In E. Barham & B. Sylvander (Eds.), Labels of origin for food: Local development, global recognition (pp. 75–91). CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845933524.0075

Belletti, G., Marescotti, A., & Touzard, J.-M. (2017). Geographical indications, public goods, and sustainable development: The roles of actors’ strategies and public policies. World Development, 98, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.004

Blakeney, M. (2015). Protecting the knowledge and cultural expressions of Aboriginal peoples. University of Western Australia Law Review, 39(2), 180–207.

Bowen, S. (2010). Embedding local places in global spaces: Geographical indications as a territorial development strategy. Rural Sociology, 75(2), 209–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00007.x

Calboli, I., & Lee, E. (Eds.). (2014). Trademark protection and territoriality challenges in a global economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Coombe, R. J. (1998). The cultural life of intellectual properties: Authorship, appropriation, and the law. Duke University Press.

Dinas Komunikasi, Informatika, dan Statistik Provinsi Lampung. (2022, July 25). Program Desa Wisata Kampung Tapis untuk mengembangkan, menjaga, dan melestarikan kerajinan Tapis. https://diskominfotik.lampungprov.go.id/detail-post/program-desa-wisata-kampung-tapis-untuk-mengembangkan-menjaga-dan-melestarikan-kerajinan-tapis

Dinas Koperasi, Usaha Kecil, dan Menengah Provinsi Lampung. (2024). Rencana kerja Dinas Koperasi, Usaha Kecil, dan Menengah Provinsi Lampung tahun 2025. https://koperasiukm.lampungprov.go.id/berkas/uploads/UKWYlQvMcqOCgjkTuhO13JfG2qyn6KPe7iRpu5qv.pdf

Dinas Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif Provinsi Lampung. (2025, June 30). Statistik perjalanan wisatawan nusantara tujuan Provinsi Lampung tahun 2024. https://disparekraf.lampungprov.go.id/detail-post/statistik-perjalanan-wisatawan-nusantara-tujuan-provinsi-lampung-tahun-2024

Dinas Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Provinsi Lampung. (2022). Laporan kinerja Dinas Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Provinsi Lampung tahun 2021. https://disperindag.lampungprov.go.id/berkas/uploads/lkj_21.pdf

Drahos, P., & Braithwaite, J. (2002). Information feudalism: Who owns the knowledge economy? The New Press.

Gangjee, D. (2012). Relocating the law of geographical indications. Cambridge University Press.

Geographical Indications Registry. (2011). Manual of geographical indications practice and procedure. Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. https://www.ipindia.gov.in/frontend/pdf/mannual/1_31_1_manual-of-geographical-indications-practice-and-procedure.pdf

Government of India. (1999). The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 (Act No. 48 of 1999). Ministry of Commerce and Industry.

Government of India. (2002). The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Rules, 2002. Ministry of Commerce and Industry. https://ipindia.gov.in/writereaddata/Portal/IPORule/1_27_1_gi-rules.pdf

Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 on the Implementation of Law Number 24 of 2019 on the Creative Economy. (2022). Government of the Republic of Indonesia.

Hartono, L. (1997). Kain Tapis Lampung: Perubahan fungsi, motif dan makna simbolis. LPP Universitas Sebelas Maret dan UNS Press.

Japan. (1974). Act on the Promotion of Traditional Craft Industries (Act No. 57 of 1974).

Japan. (2014). Act on Protection of the Names of Specific Agricultural, Forestry and Fishery Products and Foodstuffs (Act No. 84 of 2014).

Law Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. (2016). Government of the Republic of Indonesia. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/37595/uu-no-20-tahun-2016

Law Number 24 of 2019 on the Creative Economy. (2019). Government of the Republic of Indonesia.

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2015). Geographical Indication Protection System: Guidelines for the use of geographical indications. https://www.maff.go.jp/e/policies/intel/gi_act/attach/pdf/index-3.pdf

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2019). Explanation note for GI application process. https://www.maff.go.jp/e/policies/intel/gi_act/attach/pdf/index-4.pdf

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. (2025, October 27). New designation of Tokyo Tebori Insho as a traditional craft under the Act on the Promotion of Traditional Craft Industries. https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2025/1027_003.html

Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 12 of 2019 on Geographical Indications. (2019). Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia.

Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 10 of 2022 amending Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 12 of 2019 on Geographical Indications. (2022). Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia.

Rangnekar, D. (2004). The socio-economics of geographical indications: A review of empirical evidence from Europe(Issue Paper No. 8). UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development.

Republic of Korea. (2015). Craft Industry Promotion Act (Act No. 13299). https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_mobile/viewer.do?hseq=38487&key=17&type=part

Tregear, A., Arfini, F., Belletti, G., & Marescotti, A. (2007). Regional foods and rural development: The role of product qualification. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.09.010

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2010). Creative economy report 2010: Creative economy—A feasible development option. United Nations.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2017). Geographical indications: An introduction. https://doi.org/10.34667/TIND.28659

World Trade Organization. (1994). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), Annex 1C to the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips.pdf

Zografos, D. (2008). Geographical indications and socio-economic development (IQsensato Working Paper No. 3). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1628534

Published

2026-11-07

How to Cite

Safitri, M., Jened, R., & Sujatmiko, A. (2026). Beyond Cultural Preservation: Legal Protection of Tapis Lampung as a Creative Economy Asset through Geographical Indications. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 4(5), 1913–1929. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i5.898