Restorative Justice for Victims of Narcotic Abuse within the Indonesian Legal System: Strengthening Social Legitimacy and State–Society Harmonization

Authors

  • Bonifasius Hargens Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Waty Suwarty Haryono Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Ali Johardi Wirogioto Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Jakarta, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.1031

Keywords:

restorative justice, narcotics, rehabilitation, social legitimacy, Indonesian legal system

Abstract

Narcotic abuse in Indonesia is not merely a criminal law problem; it is also deeply intertwined with public health concerns, social vulnerability, stigma, family resilience, and public trust in the state. This article examines the application of restorative justice for victims of narcotic abuse within the Indonesian legal system, with particular focus on its role in strengthening the social legitimacy of law and harmonizing state–society relations. The study employs an empirical legal method supported by juridical-normative and socio-legal approaches. Data were gathered through an analysis of legislation, literature reviews, document studies, and in-depth interviews with informants drawn from law enforcement agencies, the National Narcotics Agency (Badan Narkotika Nasional/BNN), rehabilitation institutions, academics, and the families of narcotic abuse victims. The findings reveal that the Indonesian legal system has opened rehabilitative-restorative spaces through Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021, Attorney General's Guidelines Number 18 of 2021, and the integrated assessment mechanism. Nevertheless, implementation continues to face significant obstacles, including the dominance of a punitive paradigm, weak inter-agency coordination, limited rehabilitation facilities, inconsistent assessment practices, and persistent social stigma toward narcotic abusers.

References

Badan Narkotika Nasional. (2025). Dari data ke aksi: BNN perkuat strategi penanggulangan narkoba berbasis riset komprehensif. https://bnn.go.id/dari-data-ke-aksi-bnn-perkuat-strategi-penanggulangan-narkoba-berbasis-riset-komprehensif/

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Hamdan, H., & Afnaini, A. (2024). Implementation of restorative justice in criminal acts of narcotics and of illegal drug abuse in Indonesia. Fox Justi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(01), 72–89. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Justi/article/view/6116

Ihsan, M., Maroni, M., & Achmad, R. (2022). Restorative justice for users of narcotics through implementation of depenalization. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. [Lengkapi volume, nomor, halaman, dan DOI/URL sesuai sumber asli]

Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. (2021). Pedoman Jaksa Agung Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelesaian Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika melalui Rehabilitasi dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif sebagai Pelaksanaan Asas Dominus Litis Jaksa.

Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. (2026). Jampidum menyetujui 4 pengajuan restorative justice tindak pidana narkotika, para tersangka jalani rehabilitasi. https://story.kejaksaan.go.id/penegakan-hukum-humanis/jampidum-menyetujui-4-pengajuan-restorative-justice-tindak-pidana-narkotika-para-tersangka-jalani-rehabilitasi-mvk.html

Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penanganan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.

Marshall, T. F. (1999). Restorative justice: An overview. Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.

Mukti Fajar ND, & Achmad, Y. (2015). Dualisme penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Pustaka Pelajar.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2021). Penelitian hukum: Edisi revisi. Kencana.

Rahmawati, D. (2026, April 7). Kepala BNN bicara overkapasitas lapas: 278.376 penghuni, 54% terkait narkotika. detikNews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-8433128/kepala-bnn-bicara-overkapasitas-lapas-278-376-penghuni-54-terkait-narkotika

Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika.

Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Sari, Y., Saefudin, Y., & Yazi, F. N. B. M. (2023). Restorative justice in drug abuse cases: An effort to effective social rehabilitation. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 9(2), 413-424. https://doi.org/10.31599/k0wj5z78

Shalasa, I. M., & Suyono, Y. U. (2023). Implementation of restorative justice system for drug abusers. Ius Positum: Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v2i3.360

Soekanto, S. (2014). Pengantar penelitian hukum. UI Press.

Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–547.

Susilo, E., & Negara, D. S. (2025). Critiquing the use of the term restorative justice in narcotics cases. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 10(3), 376-393. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i3.12150

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2020). Handbook on restorative justice programmes (2nd ed.). United Nations.

World Health Organization, & United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2020). International standards for the treatment of drug use disorders: Revised edition incorporating results of field-testing. World Health Organization.

Zehr, H., & Gohar, A. (2003). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.

Published

2026-08-18

How to Cite

Hargens, B., Haryono, W. S., & Wirogioto, A. J. (2026). Restorative Justice for Victims of Narcotic Abuse within the Indonesian Legal System: Strengthening Social Legitimacy and State–Society Harmonization. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 4(3), 806–816. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.1031