Hybrid Criminal Liability Based on Risk-Based Approach in Artificial Intelligence-Based Crimes in Indonesia

Authors

  • Mohammad Erfan Universitas Boyolali, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia.
  • Nanik Sutarni Universitas Boyolali, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia.
  • Ananda Megha Wiedhar Saputri Universitas Boyolali, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia.
  • Sri Budi Raharjo Universitas Boyolali, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.1125

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, criminal liability, hybrid liability, risk-based approach, criminal law

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has introduced new challenges in criminal law, particularly regarding criminal liability in technology-based crimes. AI systems capable of operating semi-autonomously blur the relationship between the perpetrator, the act, and culpability, rendering the conventional fault-based principle of geen straf zonder schuld increasingly inadequate. This study aims to analyze the existing Indonesian criminal law framework governing AI-related crimes and to formulate an ideal model of criminal liability in response to such developments. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that current regulations in Indonesia remain limited and have not comprehensively addressed the complexity of AI-based crimes. Accordingly, this study proposes a hybrid criminal liability model based on a risk-based approach, integrating strict liability, vicarious liability, and risk-based accountability as mechanisms for proportional responsibility distribution without recognizing AI as a legal subject. This model is expected to contribute to the reform of criminal law toward a more adaptive, responsive, and just legal system in addressing AI-related crimes.

References

Anggraeny, K. D., Khakim, M., & Sirojudin, M. R. (2024). The urgency of cybercrime law reform in Indonesia: Resolving artificial intelligence criminal liability. JUSTISI.

Eurike, H., Gresmelian, A., & Afifah, W. (2024). Criminal responsibility of artificial intelligence committing deepfake crimes in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities.

European Parliament and of the Council. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/1689.

Fletcher, G. P. (1998). Basic Concepts of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.

Haris, M. T. A. R., & Tantimin. (2022). Analisis pertanggungjawaban hukum pidana terhadap pemanfaatan artificial intelligence di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 8(1).

Hutapea, N. M. S., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence and criminal liability: A preliminary study within the Indonesian legal system. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren, 7(2).

Hutapea, N. M. S., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence and criminal liability within Indonesian legal system. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren, 7(2).

Hutchinson, T. (2013). Researching and Writing in Law (3rd ed.). Thomson Reuters.

Ihsan, R. M. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban hukum tindak pidana ekonomi melalui artificial intelligence perspektif hukum Islam dan hukum positif Indonesia. Journal of Islamic, 8(1).

Istiqomah, et al. (2025). Kedudukan hukum deepfake AI sebagai subjek hukum dan pertanggungjawaban pidananya berdasarkan teori dualistis. Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 3(2).

Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta.

Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (2010). Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Alumni.

Muladi. (1985). Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. Alumni.

Nawawi, W. (2026). Kedudukan hukum artificial intelligence dan konstruksi pertanggungjawaban pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, 4(2).

Pamungkas, A. A., Sutarni, N., & Pranawa, B. (2025). Legal analysis of deepfake technology in Indonesia from the perspective of fair and civilized humanity. Pena Justisia, 24(1).

Radbruch, G. (2006). Statutory lawlessness and supra-statutory law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–11.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Genta Publishing.

Rahman, R. A., & Habibulah, R. (2019). The criminal liability of artificial intelligence in Indonesian criminal system. Legality Journal, 27(2).

Ramadhani, M., Hidayat, R., & Hosnah, A. U. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban pidana atas tindak pidana yang dihasilkan oleh sistem AI otonom. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran.

Rohmatulloh. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban pidana pasca KUHP baru. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Keadilan.

Saleh, R. (1983). Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Dua Pengertian Dasar dalam Hukum Pidana. Aksara Baru.

Setiawan, A. D., & Wijayanto, I. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam tindak pidana yang melibatkan artificial intelligence. YUSTISI Jurnal Hukum & Islam, 12(2).

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2007). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudarto. (2024). The urgency of cybercrime law reform in Indonesia: Resolving artificial intelligence criminal liability. JUSTISI, 11(1).

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia)

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 concerning the Criminal Code)

Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions).

Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi (UU Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection).

Wijanarko, S., et al. (2026). Konstruksi pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi pengembang AI terhadap tindak pidana pemalsuan dokumen elektronik. Lex Journal, 10(2).

Published

2026-08-22

How to Cite

Erfan, M., Sutarni, N., Megha Wiedhar Saputri, A., & Budi Raharjo, S. (2026). Hybrid Criminal Liability Based on Risk-Based Approach in Artificial Intelligence-Based Crimes in Indonesia. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 4(3), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.1125