Global Communication: Paradox of Integration and Fragmentation (A Postcolonial Perspective)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.1139Keywords:
Global Communication, Post-Colonial, Integration, Fragmentation, Digital ColonialismAbstract
This article analyzes the paradox of contemporary global communication from a post-colonial perspective, namely how communication technology and digital media simultaneously drive global integration while generating social, cultural, and political fragmentation. On the one hand, the internet, social media, and digital platforms expand cross-border connectivity, accelerate information exchange, and shape the global public sphere. On the other hand, the structure of global communication remains dominated by states and corporations from the Global North, thus reproducing colonial inequalities in a new form often referred to as digital colonialism. This research uses qualitative methods with a critical literature approach based on post-colonial theory, global communication, and the political economy of media. The results show that global integration does not occur neutrally but is shaped by power relations that determine who produces, distributes, and controls the flow of information. Fragmentation emerges through digital polarization, platform algorithms, media nationalism, and local cultural resistance to global homogenization. This article concludes that 21st-century global communication is an arena of contestation between integration and fragmentation, where colonial legacies continue to influence the structure of international communication. Therefore, a more inclusive, decolonial, and equitable global communication governance is needed.
References
Ahmed, S. A. (2026). Algorithmic dependence and digital colonialism: a conceptual framework for artificial intelligence in education and knowledge systems of the Global South. Frontiers in Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1720563
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2018). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2002). The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Bannerman, S. (2024). Platform imperialism, communications law and relational sovereignty. New Media & Society, 26(4), 1816–1833. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221077284
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. Routledge.
Birhane, A. (2020). Algorithmic Colonization of Africa. SCRIPTed, 17(2), 389–409.
Bradford, A. (2023). Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology. Oxford University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage.
Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2013). Communication Power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Polity Press.
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019a). Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019b). The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
de Freitas, M. V. (2025). Digital Sovereignty and Data Colonialism: Shaping a Just Digital Order for the Global South. https://www.policycenter.ma/publications/digital-sovereignty-and-data-colonialism-shaping-just-digital-order-global-south
Dencik, L., Hintz, A., Redden, J., & Treré, E. (2022). Data Justice. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770131
Fairclough, N. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Fuchs, C. (2024). Social Media: A Critical Introduction (4th ed.). Sage.
Jin, D. Y. (2015). Platform Imperialism. University of Illinois Press.
Jin, D. Y. (2025). Platform Imperialism Theory From the Asian Perspectives. Social Media + Society, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251329692
Kwet, M. (2019). Digital Colonialism: US Empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South. Race and Class, 60(4), 3–26.
McChesney, R. W. (2015). Rich Media, Poor Democracy. The New Press.
McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. MIT Press.
Mejias, U. A., & Couldry, N. (2024). Data Grab: The New Colonialism of Big Tech and How to Fight Back. University of Chicago Press.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Mouton, M., & Burns, R. (2021). (Digital) neo-colonialism in the smart city. Regional Studies, 55(12), 1890–1901. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1915974
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression. New York University Press.
Nothias, T. (2025). An intellectual history of digital colonialism. Journal of Communication, 75(5), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaf003
Nyaaba, M., Wright, A., & Choi, G. L. (2025). Generative AI and Power Imbalances in Global Education: Frameworks for Bias Mitigation. http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02966
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble. Penguin Press.
Roberts, J. S., & Montoya, L. N. (2022). Decolonisation, Global Data Law, and Indigenous Data Sovereignty. http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.04700
Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. Vintage Books.
Salami, A. O. (2024). Artificial intelligence, digital colonialism, and the implications for Africa’s future development. Data & Policy, 6, e67. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2024.75
Schiller, H. I. (1992). Communication and Cultural Domination. Routledge.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. Polity Press.
Thussu, D. K. (2019). International Communication: Continuity and Change (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Umar Suryadi Bakry

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright :
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
- The author acknowledges that the Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (GIJLSS) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at GIJLSS.























