Reconfiguring the Principle of Legality in Indonesia’s New Criminal Code: Between Legal Certainty and Living Law

Authors

  • Eneng Raima Kordelina Saputri Nusa Putra University, Sukabumi, Indonesia.
  • Padilah Nusa Putra University, Sukabumi, Indonesia.
  • Dewi Anggraeni Nusa Putra University, Sukabumi, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i4.1173

Keywords:

Principle of Legality, Indonesian Criminal Code, living law, legal certainty, lex mitior, prohibition of analogy

Abstract

The enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Indonesian Criminal Code reconfigures the principle of legality by retaining formal legality while recognizing living law as a potential basis for criminal liability. This development raises a fundamental question concerning whether the recognition of unwritten customary norms strengthens substantive justice or undermines legal certainty and protection against arbitrary punishment. This study examines the transformation of the principle of legality from Law No. 1 of 1946 to Law No. 1 of 2023 and evaluates the compatibility of living law with the requirements of lex scripta, lex praevia, lex certa, and lex stricta. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, historical, and internal comparative approaches. Legal materials are analyzed through grammatical, systematic, historical, teleological, and conceptual interpretation. The study finds that Article 1 of Law No. 1 of 2023 maintains the requirement of prior legal regulation and expressly prohibits the use of analogy in determining criminal offences. The non-retroactivity principle also remains applicable, subject to the lex mitior rule when subsequent legal changes are more favorable to the offender. However, Article 2 recognizes living law within society, thereby extending the sources of criminal law beyond written legislation. This construction may accommodate legal pluralism and substantive justice, but it also creates risks relating to accessibility, foreseeability, consistency, and human rights protection. The article contributes to the legality debate by arguing that living law may only be applied through strict normative safeguards, clear evidentiary standards, territorial limitations, and consistent compliance with constitutional principles, human rights, and the prohibition of analogy.

References

Claes, E., & Krolikowski, M. (2008). The limits of legality in the criminal law. In Facing the limits of the law (pp. 1–19). Springer.

Council of Europe. (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Council of Europe.

Hariri, A., Wicaksana, S. U., & Arifin, S. (2022). A critical study of legal positivism as a legal system in a pluralist country. KnE Social Sciences.

Hasibuan, M. (2024). Perbandingan ketentuan asas legalitas dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Universitas Malikussaleh.

Hasibuan, M., Sumiadi, & Sastro, M. (2024). Perbandingan ketentuan asas legalitas dalam KUHP lama Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 dan KUHP baru Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa (JIM-FH) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 7(3).

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2012). Teori dan hukum pembuktian. Erlangga.

International Criminal Court. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. International Criminal Court.

Irawan, A., et al. (2023). Analisis yuridis ketentuan hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat pada Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i1.6453

Malau, P. (2023). Tinjauan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) baru 2023. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2815

Mallarangan, K. (2021). Reconstruction of the legality principle: The essence of the Pancasila spirit in criminal law reform. Rechtsidee, 8. https://doi.org/10.21070/jhr.v8i0.782

Murphy, C. C. (2010). The principle of legality in criminal law under the ECHR. European Human Rights Law Review, 2.

Olasolo, H. (2007). A note on the evolution of the principle of legality in international criminal law. Criminal Law Forum, 18.

Pawana, S. C. (2023). Polemik atas konsep “hukum yang hidup” dalam pembaharuan KUHP di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.35326/judicatum.v1i1.4045

Prastowo, R. B. B. (2018). Asas nonretroaktivitas dalam perubahan perundang-undangan pidana. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia, 24(1).

Ramadhani, D., Nur, A., Shafira, M., Dewi, E., Jatmiko, G., & Warganegara, D. (2024). Implementasi perluasan makna asas legalitas berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) nasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v3i2.2529

Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Republik Indonesia. (1946). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana.

Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Setiawan, Y. (2022). The expansion of the principle of legality in the Criminal Code as a renewal of criminal law. Ratio Legis Journal, 1(4).

Setyawan, V. P. (2021). Asas legalitas dalam perspektif filsafat hukum. Justitia et Pax, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v37i1.3276

Tongat. (2022). The ambiguous authority of living law application in new Indonesian Penal Code: Between justice and the rule of law. International Journal of Criminal Justice Science, 12(2).

United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations.

Vincentius, P. S. (2023). Pemaknaan asas legalitas materiil dalam pembaruan hukum pidana Indonesia. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59435/gjmi.v1i1.3

Widayati, L. S. (2011). Perluasan asas legalitas dalam RUU KUHP. Negara Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2).

Yanto, A., & Hikmah, F. (2023). Akomodasi hukum yang hidup dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Nasional menurut perspektif asas legalitas. Recht Studiosum Law Review, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.32734/rslr.v2i2.14162

Yuherawan, D. S. B., Juita, S. R., Utari, I. S., & Soraya, J. (2021). Asas nullum crimen sine poena pada Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Pidana & Kriminologi, 2(1).

Downloads

Published

2026-10-29

How to Cite

Saputri, E. R. K., Padilah, P., & Anggraeni, D. (2026). Reconfiguring the Principle of Legality in Indonesia’s New Criminal Code: Between Legal Certainty and Living Law. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 4(4), 1860–1870. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i4.1173

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (September - October 2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Eneng Raima Kordelina Saputri, Padilah, Dewi Anggraeni

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright :

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
  2. The author acknowledges that the Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (GIJLSS) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at GIJLSS.