Reconstruction of Protective Clauses in Auction Minutes to Strengthen Legal Protection for Winners in Auctions of Receivables Secured by Mortgage Rights

Authors

  • Iwan Supriyanto Universitas Pasundan, Bandung, Indonesia.
  • Ummi Maskanah Universitas Pasundan, Bandung, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i4.1198

Keywords:

Auction Minutes, Good-Faith Auction Winner, Mortgage Rights, Protective Provisions, Receivables Assignment

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal position and evidentiary scope of Auction Minutes in auctions of receivables secured by Mortgage Rights and formulates a protective-document framework for good-faith auction winners. The research addresses the gap between the formal authenticity of Auction Minutes and the limited preventive protection available when disputes arise concerning the validity, assignment, notification, registration, or enforcement of receivables. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed through grammatical, systematic, teleological, and prescriptive legal reasoning. The findings show that Auction Minutes primarily authenticate the conduct and result of the auction but do not independently establish the substantive validity of the receivable or automatically confer an effective creditor position on the winner. Effective protection depends on valid assignment, debtor notification, transfer of supporting documents, and registration of the Mortgage Right. The novelty lies in a differentiated framework that distributes protective provisions among Auction Minutes, auction terms, seller representations, assignment instruments, debtor-notification documents, and registration records. This framework clarifies responsibilities, allocates risks proportionately, preserves lawful debtor defenses, and strengthens preventive legal protection without granting absolute immunity to the auction winner.

References

Asuan. (2021). Legal protection in mortgage rights execution auctions. Solusi, 19(2), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v19i2.365

Azzahra, S. F., & Badriyah, S. M. (2023). Legal protection for auction winners of mortgage execution objects. Lex Renaissance, 8(1), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol8.iss1.art10

Barak, A. (2005). Purposive interpretation in law. Princeton University Press.

Dharsana, I. M. P., & Kresnadjaja, I. (2023). Transfer of receivables to third parties through cessie. Law Doctoral Community Service Journal, 2(2), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.55637/ldcsj.2.2.7608.100-105

Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. Harvard University Press.

Ekaratri, A., & Gunadi, A. (2024). Juridical analysis of the settlement of the transfer of receivables by cessie between UOB Bank and Linda Soetanto. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(4), 485–492.

Fahmi, N. K. F., Astutik, S., Nasoetion, D. W., & Hartoyo. (2025). Legal protection of buyers in the transfer of receivables by banks in cessie. Requisitoire Law Enforcement, 17(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.59651/relae.v17i1.266

Government of the Republic of Indonesia. (1996). Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights over Land and Objects Related to Land.

Government of the Republic of Indonesia. (1997). Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.

Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83–119. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70

Hutapea, J. A. P. (2021). Legal protection for debtors in mortgage rights execution auctions that do not reach the maximum value. Kertha Semaya, 9(3), 404–414. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i03.p03

Ibrahim, J. (2013). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.

Indonesian Civil Code.

Kelsen, H. (2005). Pure theory of law. University of California Press.

Krisnawaty, K., Muskibah, M., & Abu Bakar, F. (2026). Transfer of mortgage rights resulting from cession as a land administration act: Peralihan hak tanggungan akibat cessie sebagai tindakan administrasi pertanahan. Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law, 7(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.22437/mendapo.v7i1.53383

MacCormick, N., & Summers, R. S. (Eds.). (1991). Interpreting statutes: A comparative study. Dartmouth Publishing.

Margono, S. (2019). The position of auction minutes in the transfer of land rights. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.2006

Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Penelitian hukum. Kencana.

Mertokusumo, S. (2010). Mengenal hukum: Suatu pengantar. Liberty.

Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Minister of Finance Regulation Number 122 of 2023 concerning Auction Implementation Guidelines.

Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. (2024). Minister of Finance Regulation Number 86 of 2024 concerning Auction Minutes.

Nurhayati, Y. (2020). Legal protection for good-faith auction purchasers. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.113-128

Pramono, N. (2014). Legal consequences of receivables assignment through cessie. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol21.iss3.art5

Pranata, I. G. F. A., Tondi, C. J., & Kadir, T. (2025). Legal certainty of new creditors as cessionaries in deeds of receivables assignment that do not meet formal requirements. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, 2(8), 1696–1709. https://doi.org/10.62335/cendekia.v2i8.1774

Pratiwi, R. M. D., Widhiyanti, H. N., & Wisnuwardhani, D. A. (2023). Legal protection for buyers of mortgage rights execution auctions in the case of blocking the certificate of ownership which becomes the object of the auction. Batulis Civil Law Review, 4(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v4i2.1713

Prihantoro, B. A., & Gultom, E. (2025). The urgency of the bank’s notification letter to the customer for the transfer of receivables to other parties. JOSH: Journal of Sharia, 4(2), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.55352/josh.v4i02.1920

Rahmawati, A., Syahyu, Y., & Masri, E. (2025). Legal protection for cessie recipients in the assignment of mortgage rights over land and buildings. Journal of Law and Security Studies, 2(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.31599/6pr7kc77

Sani, R. I., Suartini, Ahmad, Permana, T. C. I., & Nasir, G. A. (2025). The paradox of cessie: Juridical risks behind the euphoria of non-performing asset purchases. Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies, 6(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v6i2.16090

Santoso, B. (2020). The prudential principle in civil transactions. Jurnal Perspektif Hukum, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v20i2.89

Shahrullah, R. S. (2019). Legal certainty from the perspective of legal development in Indonesia: An analysis of Jan Michiel Otto’s thought. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art6

Simatupang, T. H. (2021). The evidentiary power of auction minutes as authentic deeds. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v10i2.789

Siswanto, C. A., & Tedjokusumo, D. D. (2024). Maintaining debtors’ rights in cessie actions through implementing the principle of transparency. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v20i2.10692

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2014). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat (16th ed.). Rajawali Pers.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2005). Decision Number 158 K/Pdt/2005.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2015). Decision Number 3564 K/Pdt/2015.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 4 of 2016 concerning the enforcement of the formulation of the 2016 Supreme Court Chamber Plenary Meeting results as guidelines for the implementation of duties by courts.

Tenritata, A. L., Afriana, A., & Harrieti, N. (2018). Legal certainty concerning receivables assignment through cessie in housing loan practices from the perspective of the Indonesian Civil Code. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 3(2), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v3i2.765

Yani, A. (2020). Legal protection for auction winners in mortgage rights execution auctions. Jurnal De Jure, 20(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.305-320

Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-27

How to Cite

Supriyanto, I., & Maskanah, U. (2026). Reconstruction of Protective Clauses in Auction Minutes to Strengthen Legal Protection for Winners in Auctions of Receivables Secured by Mortgage Rights. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 4(4), 1765–1782. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i4.1198

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (September - October 2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Iwan Supriyanto, Ummi Maskanah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright :

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
  2. The author acknowledges that the Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (GIJLSS) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at GIJLSS.