The Importance of Standard Language for Legal Certainty in the Protection of Parties within Agreements

Authors

  • Arina Novizas Shebubakar Universitas Al-Azhar Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Anis Rifai Universitas Al-Azhar Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Chandra Yusuf Universitas YARS, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Siti Farhani Universitas Al-Azhar Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.1350

Keywords:

Agreement, standard language, interpretation

Abstract

This research examines the significance of standard language in agreements and its impact using a qualitative descriptive method. The qualitative descriptive method was selected to provide a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the complexities between language and the law. This study analyzes agreements to identify the use of standard language and its effect on legal interpretation. The study demonstrates the importance of standard language in agreements, as language influences legal consequences through word choice and sentence structure. These conclusions contribute to an understanding of how standard language affects the law. The use of the Indonesian language in agreements within Indonesia must pay heed to clarity, consistency, and the accuracy of legal terms. The use of non-standard language in agreements can result in several serious legal consequences. The implication is that this study may assist legal practitioners in drafting agreements. This research is significant to the literature on language and law, emphasizing the importance of standard language in agreements.

References

Badrulzaman, M. D. (2001). Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan. PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.

Britannica, E. (n.d.-a). Dutch East India Company.

Britannica, E. (n.d.-b). Dutch Republic.

Brownsword, R. (2006). Contract Law Themes for the twenty-first century (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford UK.

D.Laiman, Alamo, Dewi Savitri Reni, Ronald Lengkong, and S. A. (n.d.). The Indonesian Legal System and Legal Research.

Endicott, T. L. I. (2011). Legal Research Paper Series. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228183946_Legal_Interpretation

Friedman, W. (1960). Legal Theory. Stevens & Sons Limited.

Fuady, A. R. (2024). INNOVATIVE: Journal of Social Science Research. INNOVATIVE: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(2), 1715–1729.

Grotius, H. (1646). The Law of War and Peace: De Jure Belli et Pacis. Kelsey, F.W. trans., Oxford.

Hasan, M. (2009). Kontrak Minyak dan Gas Bumi Berazas Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum. Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska,.

Institute, L. I. (n.d.). Ratio Decidendi. Cornell Law School.

Khemlani, S. (n.d.). Reasoning. ResearchGate. Retrieved June 28, 2021, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324271986_Reasoning

Kurniawati, R., Mulyadi, A., & Agustanti, R. D. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penyebaran Konten Asusila. Hukum Dan Masyarakat Madani, 11(Mei), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.26623/HUMANI.V11I1.3414

LIAMCO v. Libya. (1981).

Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Best practice. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved June 22, 2021, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/best%20practice

Sapphire v. National Iranian Oil Company. (1967).

Syauqi, A., Bakri, M., Permadi, I. (2020). Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2290K/PDT/2012 Tentang Pinjam Meminjam Uang Dengan Surat Pengakuan Utang Dan Kuasa Menjual. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan.

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Shebubakar, A. N., Rifai, A., Yusuf , C., & Farhani, S. (2026). The Importance of Standard Language for Legal Certainty in the Protection of Parties within Agreements. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 4(3), 951–959. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.1350