Reconstructing Penal Sanctions in Regional Regulations of Asymmetrically Decentralised Regions After the Enactment of Indonesia's National Criminal Code
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i4.1362Keywords:
Asymmetric decentralization, Regional regulation, Penal sanction, Ultimum remedium, Living lawAbstract
Indonesia delegates a limited penal authority to local governments while simultaneously recognising asymmetric decentralisation for Aceh, Papua, and the Special Region of Yogyakarta. This study analyses how penal sanctions in regional regulations are regulated, how they are implemented, and how they should be reformulated after Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code and Law Number 1 of 2026 on Penal Adjustment. Combining normative and empirical legal research, the study applies statutory, philosophical, comparative, and futuristic approaches, supported by semi-structured interviews with regional enforcement officials in South Sumatra, Jakarta, Aceh, and Papua. The findings show that local penal authority is attributive yet bounded, and that asymmetry materially widens punishment only in Aceh through the jinayah regime, whereas Papua and Yogyakarta concentrate their specificity on distributive and cultural affairs. Empirically, administrative sanctions dominate enforcement because penal processes are slow, costly, and institutionally constrained, leaving criminal provisions to function as a deterrent reserve. The abolition of confinement and the adoption of a fine-category system now compel systematic revision. This study proposes an omnibus regional regulation model grounded in ultimum remedium, proportionality, and the recognition of living law.
References
Al-Fatih, S., Safa'at, M. A., Widiarto, A. E., Al Uyun, D., & Nur, M. (2023). The hierarchical model of delegated legislation in Indonesia. Lex Scientia Law Review, 7(2), 629–658. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.74651
Allo, H. B., Ilmar, A., & Razak, A. (2025). Asymmetric decentralisation arrangements in the implementation of regional autonomy in Indonesia. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(4), 1975–1984. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6442
Anggoro, S. A., & Setia Negara, T. A. (2022). The struggle for recognition: Adat law trajectories under Indonesian politics of legal unification. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 29(1), 33–62. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10040
Arifin, R., Alkadri, R., Smith, R. B., Smith, N. N., & Wahyudin, W. (2024). Indonesia's new penal code: Harmonizing with global justice or defying international norms? Lex Scientia Law Review, 8(1), 561–594. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14271
Astariyani, N. L. G., Hattori, M., & Hanum, W. N. (2024). The validity of sanctions arrangements in regional regulations. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 4(3), 682–705. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i3.313
Butt, S. (2023). Indonesia's new Criminal Code: Indigenising and democratising Indonesian criminal law? Griffith Law Review, 32(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2023.2243772
Butt, S., & Murharjanti, P. (2022). What constitutes compliance? Legislative responses to Constitutional Court decisions in Indonesia. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(1), 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac014
Faisal, F., Yanto, A., Rahayu, D. P., Haryadi, D., Darmawan, A., & Manik, J. D. N. (2024). Genuine paradigm of criminal justice: Rethinking penal reform within Indonesia New Criminal Code. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), Article 2301634. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2301634
Hermanto, B. (2023). Deliberate legislative reforms to improve the legislation quality in developing countries: Case of Indonesia. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 11(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2080392
Hermanto, B., & Aryani, N. M. (2021). Omnibus legislation as a tool of legislative reform by developing countries: Indonesia, Turkey and Serbia practice. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 9(3), 425–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2027162
Isra, S., & Tegnan, H. (2021). Legal syncretism or the theory of unity in diversity as an alternative to legal pluralism in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(6), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-04-2018-0082
Jaelani, A. K., & Hayat, M. J. (2022). The proliferation of regional regulation cancellation in Indonesia. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 2(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v2i2.38
Khairul Muluk, M. R., & Anantanatorn, A. (2023). Comparing symmetric-asymmetric decentralization for reducing regional tension: Indonesia and Thailand experience. Policy & Governance Review, 7(2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v7i2.731
Kramer, E., Masduki, M., Rosemary, R., Maryani, E., Nurhajati, L., & Redjeki, A. M. S. (2023). How do national laws filter down to the local? Tobacco control regulations and smoke free areas in a decentralised Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034231185159
Rochaeti, N., Prasetyo, M. H., Rozah, U., & Park, J. (2023). A restorative justice system in Indonesia: A close view from the indigenous peoples' practices. Sriwijaya Law Review, 7(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.1919.pp87-104
Rodiyah, R., Idris, S. H., & Smith, R. B. (2023). Mainstreaming justice in the establishment of laws and regulations process: Comparing case in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Australia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(1), 333–378. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.60096
Silambi, E. D., Moenta, P., Patittingi, F., & Azisa, N. (2022). Ideal concept of traditional justice in solving criminal case. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(1), 293. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0026
Sofwan, S., Haeruman, H., & Basniwati, A. D. (2023). Penegakan sanksi pidana terhadap pelanggaran peraturan daerah: Kajian terhadap pelaksanaan peraturan daerah Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. Journal Kompilasi Hukum, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v8i2.137
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yulita Anggraini, Iza Rumesten, Artha Febriansyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright :
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
- The author acknowledges that the Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (GIJLSS) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at GIJLSS.






















