Juridical Analysis Of Final Review Review (Pk) Of Criminal Corruption Cases By The Head Of Personnel Body Formation In Pagar Alam City

Authors

  • Dwi Putri Rhamadani University Tama Jagakarsa, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Tardip Panggabean University Tama Jagakarsa, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Eni Jaya University Tama Jagakarsa, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v2i1.151

Keywords:

Corruption, abuse of authority, pagar alam city

Abstract

This research is to find out the Legal Considerations of the Panel of Judges in imposing a criminal verdict on corruption committed by the Head of Formation of the Civil Service Agency in using his position in Pagar Alam City (Case study of Cassation Decision No. 2697 K/Pid.sus/2016, with PK No. 163/Pid.sus/2019). Where the regulations regarding the eradication of corruption are listed in Law No.20 of 2001 which has been revised in several articles. The formulation of the problem in this study How is the verdict of the panel of Judges at the Cassation level in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia with Number 2697 K / PID.SUS / 2016, against the perpetrators of abuse of authority due to acts of Corruption related to the appointment of honorer to CPNS, and how is the verdict of the Supreme Court Judges at the level of Reconsideration against the perpetrators of the crime of participation (article 55 of the Criminal Code) as the head official of the personnel formation field of Pagar Alam City with decision number: 163 PK/Pid.sus/2019. This research is a qualitative normative juridical research which is then presented descriptively by describing the problem and drawing conclusions to determine the results. The result of the research obtained is that the judge's consideration at the cassation level is not in accordance with the applicable law because the perpetrator is an official in a government office who abuses his authority so that it is appropriate for the decision of the supreme court judge at the cassation level to impose a sentence in accordance with the applicable law.

References

Abdullah, "Hukum Kepegawaian Indonesia", Rangkang Education Yogyakarta & PuKap- Indonesia, 2012, hlm.2

Abdulkadir Muhammad. "Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Cet. 1". Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. 2004, Hlm 52,

Adami Chazawi, "Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian I", RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta,2014, hlm. 67,

Dellyna,Shant, "Konsep Penegakan Hukum". Yogyakarta : Liberty1988, Hal 34

Djoko Sumaryanto, "Pembalikan Pembebanan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam rangka pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara", Jakrta, PT. Prestasi Pustakarya,2009, Hlm110

Ermansjah Djaja, 2010, "Memberantas Korupsi Bersama KPK (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi)",Sinar Grafika, Jakarta hlm. 13.

Firman Wijaya, "Delik Penyalahgunaan Jabatan dan Suap dalam Praktek", Penaku

Idhamsyah, "Pelaksaan Hukum Dalam Masyaraka", Terdapat di situs "https://idhmsyah12.wordpress.com/"Pelaksanaan hukum-dalam-Masyarakat/. Skripsi . Universitas Pancasila Th 2018 Survei Transparency International "terdapat pada situs https://ti.or.id/perpustakaan/

Kimberly Ann Eliot. "Korupsi dan Ekonomi Dunia" Yayasan Obor: Indonesia, Jakarta hlm 1-2

Nandang Alamsah D dan Sigit Suseno, "Modul 1 Pengertian dan Ruang Lingkup Tindak Pidana Khusus", hlm. 7

UU No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang perubahan atas UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Published

2024-03-28

How to Cite

Rhamadani, D. P., Panggabean, T., & Jaya, E. (2024). Juridical Analysis Of Final Review Review (Pk) Of Criminal Corruption Cases By The Head Of Personnel Body Formation In Pagar Alam City. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 2(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v2i1.151