Juridical Analysis of Death Penalty Decisions in Drug Cases in Article 114 Law Number 35 of 2009 (Case Study Decision Number 145/PK/Pidsus/2016)

Authors

  • Agung Pranoto Bhayangkara University, Jakarta Raya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v2i2.206

Keywords:

Review of the Legal Consequences of the Establishment of the Death Penalty in Narcotics Cases

Abstract

Narcotics crimes damage the future of the nation's generations in various aspects of life. Research result; By rejecting the request for review from the applicant for review/convict: FREDI BUDIMAN alias BUDI bin H. NANANG HIDAYAT; means that it does not fulfill the provisions of Article 263 paragraphs (2) and (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, then based on the provisions of Article 266 paragraph (2) letter a of the Criminal Procedure Code, the request for review from the Judicial Review Applicant/Convict is due to the Judge's error or obvious error in the Judex Facti and Judex Juris decisions. , nor can it be justified because in the Judex Facti and Judex Juris decisions. The judicial review by the Supreme Court is in accordance with the provisions of Article 270 Jo. Article 271 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This is supported by the President's rejection of clemency submitted by convicts on death row for narcotics crimes in accordance with applicable provisions which also automatically stipulate that the court decision has permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde). This has also provided legitimacy for the Prosecutor to carry out executions in accordance with the provisions of Article 270 Jo. Article 271 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Author's Suggestions; That the decision can be used as jurisprudence for cases that are similar and have similarities to this case. There is a need to re-evaluate legal findings regarding state officials that provide legal certainty in the field.

References

Kadarmanta, Narkoba Pembunuh Karakter Bangsa, (PT. Forum Media Utama, Jakarta, 2010).

Badan Narkotika Nasional, Pedoman Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Narkoba bagi Pemuda, Jakarta. 2004.

Bambang Waluyo, Viktimologi Perlindungan Korban dan Saksi.Sinar Grafika.Jakarta. 2011.

Bagir Manan, Perkembangan Pemikiran dan pengaturan Hak Asai Manusia di Indonesia (Jakarta: Yayasan Hak Asasi Manusia, Demokrasi dan Supermasi Hukum, 2001).

Chairul Huda, 2006. Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kealahan. Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Teori Pemisahan Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Kencana Prenada Media, Jakarta.

Didik M Arif Mansur, Elisatris Gultom, Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan Antara Norma dan Realita.Rajawali Pers.Jakarta.2006.

Didik M Arief Mansur, Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.2014.

Henry Pandapotan Panggabean, Fungsi Mahkamah Agung Bersifat Pengaturan, (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2005).

Ibrahim, Johnny. 2006, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Muladi, Hak Asasi Manusia, Politik dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang. 1997.

Moh. Kusnadrdi dan Harmaily Ibrahim, Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia (Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum Tata Negara FHUI dan CV “Sinar Bakti”, Tahun 1988).

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2005, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Romli Atmasasmita, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi. Mandar Maju.Bandung.1995.

Ronny hanitijo Soemitro, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Ghailia Indonesia 1982.

R.A. Koesnan, Susunan Pidana dalam Negara Sosialis Indonesia.Sumur.Bandung.2005.

Roichatul Aswidah, Hukuman Mati Dalam Pandangan Hak Asasi Manusia, Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia (Komnas HAM), (Jakarta, 2008).

Setiono. Rule of Law (Supremasi Hukum). Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret.Surakarta 2004.

Soerjono Soekanto.Ringkasan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Empiris.Indonesia Hilleo.Jakarta.1990.

Soerjono Soekanto dan sri mumadji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, RajaGrafindo Persada.Jakarta.2001.

Subekti dan Tjitrosudibio, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. PT. Pradnya Paramita.Jakarta.2002.

W.J.S. Poerwadarminta.Amirko Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia.Balai Pustaka.1984.

Yesmin Anwar dan Adang, Kriminologi.Refika Aditama.Bandung.2012.

Undang-Undang, Peraturan Dan Putusan Hakim

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika.

Undang-undang Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 39 tahun 1999, Asa Mandiri.Jakarta.2006.

Media Sosial / Koran

Azmi Syahputra, “Indonesia Darurat Narkoba: Eksekusi Mati Harus Dijalankan”, dalam http://www.rmolsumsel.com. Diakses 23 Maret 2018.

Aristoteles, Nicomachean Ethics, translated by W.D. Ross, http://bocc.ubi.pt/ pag/Aristoteles-nicomachaen.html. (Diakses pada tanggal 20 Oktober 2000) Didownload (Selasa, 11 April 2017).

Auliah Andika Rukman, “Pidana Mati Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Sosiologis Dan Penegakan HAM,” Jurnal Equilibrium Pendidikan Sosiologi Vol. 4, No. 1 (May 2016).

Bandingkan: Mardjono Reksodiputro, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, (Jakarta: Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 1995), hlm. 23. Dalam kaitan ini Mardjono berpendapat, bahwa upaya pembaharuan hukum pidana merupakan hasil menggali pemikiran dasar falsafah Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.

Badan Pekerja Kontra, Praktik Hukuman Mati di Indonesia, diunduh dari:

http://lipsus.kompas.com/topikpilihanlist/3402/1/eksekusi.mati.terpidananarkotika>, diakses pada tanggal 15 Maret 2015.

Nelvtia Purba and Sri Sulistyawati, Pelaksanaan Hukuman Mati: Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia, Cetakan Pertama (Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2005).

Teori Perlindungan Hukum, http://hnikawawz.blogspot.com/2011/11/kajian-teori perlindungan-hukum.html. diakses tanggal 10 Juni 2013 jam 16.15 WIB.

United Nations Treaty Collection. Convention on the Rights of the Child . Diakses 18 Januari 2019, jam 12.23 WIB.

https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/2015-tahun-hukuman-mati-bagi-pengedar narkobakaleidoskop- merdeka-2015.html, diakses tanggal 2 Januari 2018.

https://www.kompasiana.com/muhammadaqila/ini-alasan-bandar-narkoba pantasmati_556ff3a1307a61f119bbf123, diakses tanggal 2 Januari 2018

Downloads

Published

2024-08-02

How to Cite

Pranoto, A. (2024). Juridical Analysis of Death Penalty Decisions in Drug Cases in Article 114 Law Number 35 of 2009 (Case Study Decision Number 145/PK/Pidsus/2016). Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 2(2), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v2i2.206

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (June 2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Agung Pranoto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright :

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
  2. The author acknowledges that the Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (GIJLSS) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at GIJLSS.