A Critical Analysis of Carbon Trading Policy as an Action for Adaptation and Mitigation of Climate Change from the Perspective of Indigenous Peoples in Indonesia

Authors

  • Muhammad Arman Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rineke Sara Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v3i3.589

Keywords:

Carbon Trading, Climate Changes, Adaptation and Mitigation, Indigeneous Peoples

Abstract

The climate crisis, biodiversity loss and pollution are three planetary crisis facing humanity today. Studies show that the primary source of these crises is the massive emissions released by developed/industrial countries over the past decades through energy, agriculture, forest and land conversion, industrialization, and waste. In 2015, the world’s nations committed to addressing the climate crisis, in accordance with the Paris Agreement. By passing Law Number 16 of 2016 about the Paris Agreement on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Indonesia, a party to the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties, ratified the Paris Agreement. Presidential Regulation Number 98 of 2021, which addressed the Implementation of Carbon Economic Values for Achieving Nationally Determined Contribution Targets and Control of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in National Development, was subsequently issued in response to this policy. The Indonesian government has disregarded the rights of Indigenous Peoples in favor of a carbon trading mechanism centered on forests and land, rather than reaffirming its commitment to combating climate change. This study critically examines carbon trading programs within the perspective of climate change adaptation and mitigation using a qualitative methodology grounded in literature analysis, particularly from the perspective of Indigenous Peoples. Findings indicate that carbon trading-based conservation models often contradict Indigenous Peoples' own conservation practices. In fact, in many regions, such projects trigger conflict, land grabbing, and the potential criminalization of Indigenous Peoples. Furthermore, carbon trading fails to address the root causes of the climate crisis. The offset scheme instead allows industrial actors to continue releasing emissions on a large scale. Therefore, this mechanism is inconsistent with the principles of climate justice, the fulfillment of Indigenous Peoples' rights, and the global obligation to curb global warming.

References

Aliansi Rakyat untuk Keadilan Iklim. (2023). Kertas posisi Koalisi Keadilan Iklim: Mendesak negara segera menyusun UU Keadilan Iklim (Rev. 5). WALHI. https://www.walhi.or.id/uploads/buku/Kertas%20Posisi%20Koalisi%20Keadilan%20Iklim_Rev5.pdf

Arizona, Yance (2010), Antara Teks dan Konteks; Dinamika pengakuan hukum Terhadap Hak Masyarakat Adat atas Sumber daya Alam di Indonesia, Jakarta: HuMa.

Binawan, A. A., & Sebastian, T. (2012). Menim(b)ang keadilan eko-sosial (Kertas Kerja EPISTEMA No. 07/2012). Jakarta: Epistema Institute.

Fraser, N. (1998). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation (WZB Discussion Paper No. FS I 98-108). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/12624

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press.

Irianto,Sulistyowati (2012) “Memperkenalkan Kajian Sosio-legal dan Implikasi Metodologisnya”, dalam Kajian Sosio-Legal: Seri Unsur-unsur Penyusun Bangunan Negara Hukum (hlm.2). ed. Adriaan W Bedner, et. al. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia, Universitas Leiden, Universitas Groningen.

Jamin, Mohammad dkk (2015), Politik Hukum Pengakuan Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Indonesia, Surakarta: UNS Press.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (2005). Pijar-pijar filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius

Rahmawati, D. A., Syafruddin, S., & Suryanto, H. (2023). Carbon trading and environmental justice: A juridical examination of fairness in Indonesia’s emissions reduction initiative. West Science Law and Human Rights Journal, 2(1), 45–57. https://wsj.westsciences.com/index.php/wslhr/article/view/1373

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Siagian, U. A. (2025, September 20). Mewujudkan keadilan ekologis. Kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/mewujudkan-keadilan-ekologis?open_from=Section_Terbaru

Siagian, U. A., & Arman, M. (2023). Kertas posisi perdagangan karbon 2023 (Rev. final). Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (AMAN). https://www.aman.or.id/files/publication-documentation/46147Kertas_Posisi_Perdagangan_Karbon_2023%20-%20fin.pdf

Simarmata, Rikardo dan Steni, Bernadinus (2017), Masyarakat Hukum Adat Sebagai Subjek Hukum: Kecakapan Hukum Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Lapangan Hukum Privat Dan Publik. (Bogor: The Samdhana Institute)

Soekanto, Soerjono (2014), Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI Press

Taufik, M. (2013). Filsafat John Rawls tentang teori keadilan. Mukkadimah: Jurnal Studi Islam, 19(1), 1–14.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Indonesia Climate Promise. Accessed on Oct 7th, 2025, retrieved from: https://climatepromise.undp.org/what-we-do/where-we-work/indonesia

Widowati, Dyah Ayu dkk (2014). Pengakuan Dan Perlindungan Hak Atas Tanah Masyarakat Hukum Adat Di Kawasan Hutan. (Yogyakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional)

Published

2025-11-20

How to Cite

Muhammad Arman, & Rineke Sara. (2025). A Critical Analysis of Carbon Trading Policy as an Action for Adaptation and Mitigation of Climate Change from the Perspective of Indigenous Peoples in Indonesia. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 3(3), 1028–1043. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v3i3.589