Wearable Artificial Intelligence in Human Communication: A PRISMA–Guided Systematic Review of Applications, Trends, and Ethical Challenges (2015–2025)

Authors

  • Ressa Uli Patrissia Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i1.783

Keywords:

wearable artificial intelligence, human communication, PRISMA systematic review, affective computing, augmentative communication, smart wearables

Abstract

Wearable artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are rapidly transforming how human communication is sensed, interpreted, and augmented across multiple social contexts. Despite increasing research interest, comprehensive synthesis of empirical studies examining wearable AI in communication remains limited. This study presents a systematic literature review following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines to map the development of wearable AI communication research published between 2015 and 2025. Searches were conducted across five major databases—Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library—yielding 93 eligible studies, of which 58 were included in a quantitative meta-analysis. The findings identify five dominant research clusters: health communication, interpersonal and social communication, occupational communication, educational communication, and accessibility communication. Smartwatches, EEG headbands, and biosensor-based wearables emerged as the most frequently used technological platforms, while deep learning architectures dominated analytical approaches. Results indicate that wearable AI systems can effectively infer communicative states such as emotional arousal, cognitive workload, and behavioral intention, with pooled accuracy exceeding 80% across several domains. However, significant challenges remain regarding methodological heterogeneity, limited demographic diversity, algorithmic bias, and underdeveloped ethical governance. The study concludes that wearable AI is reshaping the communicative landscape by integrating physiological sensing with algorithmic interpretation, while emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary research, inclusive datasets, and robust ethical frameworks to ensure equitable and responsible deployment.

References

Amft, O., & Tröster, G. (2017). On-body sensing solutions for automatic dietary monitoring. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 8(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2009.32

Bent, B., Goldstein, B. A., Kibbe, W. A., & Dunn, J. P. (2020). Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0226-6

Chang, E. F., Moses, D. A., & Leonard, M. K. (2021). Decoding speech perception from non-invasive brain recordings. Nature Neuroscience, 24(4), 478–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00827-9

Chen, J., Song, X., & Sze, N. N. (2023). EEG-based worker mental fatigue detection in construction using smart helmets: A field study. Safety Science, 158, 105984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105984

Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Xu, M. (2023). Wearable technology-enhanced adaptive learning: A longitudinal study. Computers & Education, 195, 104718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104718

Ghosh, S., Sinha, J. K., Bhattacharya, S., Bhattacharya, M., Sharma, G., & Ghosh, S. (2023). Wearable biosensors for detecting physiological indicators of conversational discomfort. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 14(2), 1244–1258. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2022.3198743

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X

Hochberg, L. R., Bacher, D., Jarosiewicz, B., Masse, N. Y., Simeral, J. D., Vogel, J., Haddadin, S., Liu, J., Cash, S. S., van der Smagt, P., & Donoghue, J. P. (2012). Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature, 485(7398), 372–375. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11076

Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M. C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Johnson, D., Deterding, S., Kuhn, K. A., Staneva, A., Stoyanov, S., & Hides, L. (2022). Augmented reality for education: A systematic review of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 37, 100498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100498

Kmet, L. M., Lee, R. C., & Cook, L. S. (2004). Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

Mankoff, J., Hayes, G. R., & Kasnitz, D. (2010). Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878807

Masood, T., & Egger, J. (2021). Augmented reality in support of intelligent manufacturing: A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, 106195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106195

Metzger, S. L., Liu, J. R., Moses, D. A., Dougherty, M. E., Seaton, M. P., Littlejohn, K. T., Chartier, J., Anumanchipalli, G. K., Tu-Chan, A., Ganguly, K., & Chang, E. F. (2024). A high-performance non-invasive brain-computer interface for phoneme-based speech synthesis. Nature Neuroscience, 27(2), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01485-z

Obermeyer, Z., & Emanuel, E. J. (2016). Predicting the future: Big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(13), 1216–1219. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1606181

Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

Page, M., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Picard, R. W. (2019). Emotion research by the people, for the people. Emotion Review, 11(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919864649

Seneviratne, S., Hu, Y., Nguyen, T., Lan, G., Khalifa, S., Thilakarathna, K., Hassan, M., & Seneviratne, A. (2017). A survey of wearable devices and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(4), 2573–2620. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2731979

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Torous, J., Myrick, K. J., Rauseo-Ricupero, N., & Firth, J. (2020). Digital mental health and COVID-19: Using technology today to accelerate the curve on access and quality tomorrow. JMIR Mental Health, 7(3), e18848. https://doi.org/10.2196/18848

Wang, F., Zheng, J., Wang, H., Yang, X., & Zuo, M. (2022). Federated learning for wearable-based pain communication detection in oncology: A multi-site study. Npj Digital Medicine, 5(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00614-9

Wobbrock, J. O., & Kientz, J. A. (2016). Research contributions in human-computer interaction. Interactions, 23(3), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/2907069

Zander, T. O., & Kothe, C. (2011). Towards passive brain–computer interfaces: Applying brain–computer interface technology to human systems in the real world. Journal of Neural Engineering, 8(2), 025005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025005

Downloads

Published

2026-04-25

How to Cite

Patrissia, R. U. (2026). Wearable Artificial Intelligence in Human Communication: A PRISMA–Guided Systematic Review of Applications, Trends, and Ethical Challenges (2015–2025). Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 4(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i1.783

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (March - May 2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Ressa Uli Patrissia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright :

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
  2. The author acknowledges that the Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (GIJLSS) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at GIJLSS.