Legal Accountability of Deck Officers in Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships: A Normative Analysis of COLREGS and STCW Compliance Gaps in Indonesian Domestic Shipping
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i1.799Keywords:
maritime autonomous surface ships, legal accountability, COLREGS, STCW, Indonesian maritime lawAbstract
The rapid advancement of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship (MASS) technology has exposed fundamental normative deficiencies in existing international maritime law, particularly in frameworks governing collision regulations and seafarer certification. This study examines legal accountability in MASS operations, where the traditional human–vessel nexus in COLREGS and STCW is disrupted srupted. Using normative legal and comparative analysis, the study evaluates the adequacy of COLREGS 1972, STCW, SOLAS, and Indonesian Law No. 17 of 2008 in addressing accountability in MASS incidents. Through document analysis of IMO regulatory scoping exercise outputs, EU maritime law developments, and Indonesian domestic shipping regulations, supplemented by thematic expert consultations, the study identifies three principal normative gaps: the absence of a defined legal subject for autonomous decision-making, the inadequacy of STCW competency standards for remote operations, and the fragmented liability regime between flag states, operators, and technology developers. The study proposes a layered normative accountability model tailored to the Indonesian domestic shipping context. Findings contribute to the development of a coherent legal architecture capable of governing the transitional phase of maritime autonomy and offer actionable recommendations for Indonesian maritime regulatory reform.
References
Black, J. (2001). Decentring regulation: Understanding the role of regulation and self-regulation in a post-regulatory world. Current Legal Problems, 54(1), 103–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/54.1.103
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burmeister, H. C., Bruhn, W., Walther, L., & Rötting, M. (2014). Towards autonomous shipping: Beneficial or threatening for the human element and maritime safety? International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 8(3), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.08.03.05
Cahyadi, A. (2020). Hukum pelayaran Indonesia dan regulasi kapal otonom: Tinjauan normatif terhadap Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2008. Jurnal Hukum Transportasi dan Logistik, 7(2), 45–62.
Carey, M., & Knapp, S. (2019). Autonomous ships and the maritime regulatory framework: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Navigation, 72(4), 1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463318001091
Chircop, A. (2018). Testing the adequacy of international maritime law for autonomous commercial vessel navigation. Ocean Development & International Law, 49(4), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2018.1502474
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
De la Rue, C., & Anderson, C. B. (2020). Shipping and the environment: Law and practice (3rd ed.). Informa Law from Routledge.
Felski, A., & Zwolak, K. (2020). The ocean-going autonomous ship — Challenges and threats. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(1), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8010041
Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The concept of law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
International Maritime Organization. (1972). Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS). IMO.
International Maritime Organization. (1974). International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). IMO.
International Maritime Organization. (1978/2010). International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW), as amended by the 2010 Manila Amendments. IMO.
International Maritime Organization. (2021). MSC-LEG-MEPC.2/Circ.3: Outcome of the regulatory scoping exercise for the use of maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS). IMO.
Kim, M., Joung, T. H., Jeong, B., & Park, H. S. (2020). Autonomous shipping and its impact on regulations, maritime safety, and risk management. Ocean Engineering, 217, Article 107,488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107488
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Edisi Revisi). Prenada Media Group.
Papachristou, D. (2020). Legal liability for collisions involving autonomous vessels: Identifying the applicable rules under international maritime law. Journal of International Maritime Law, 26(4), 261–279.
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. ESRC Methods Programme.
Porathe, T. (2019). Remote control and autonomous ships: Safety and security issues. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation. AHFE. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20503-4_31
Priyatna, A. (2019). Tanggung jawab hukum nakhoda dalam hukum maritim Indonesia: Perspektif komparatif. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 49(3), 512–530. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no3.2424
Ringbom, H. (2019). Regulating autonomous ships — Concepts, challenges and precedents. Ocean Development & International Law, 50(2–3), 141–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2019.1582705
Røsæg, E. (2019). Autonomous ships, the law and practice. Nordisk Institutt for Sjørett, 1(1), 1–35.
Tetley, W. (2002). International maritime and admiralty law. Éditions Yvon Blais.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2008 tentang Pelayaran [Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2008 on Shipping]. (2008). Sekretariat Negara.
Veal, R., & Tsimplis, M. (2017). The integration of unmanned ships into the lex maritima. Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 1, 303–335.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Natanael Suranta, Tri Cahyadi, Irfan Faozun

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright :
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
- The author acknowledges that the Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (GIJLSS) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at GIJLSS.























