The Political Business of Welfare: Social Assistance, Patronage Networks, and Poverty Management in the 2024 Legislative Election in Kupang Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i4.903Keywords:
Social Assistance, Welfare Politics, Patronage Networks, Electoral Clientelism, Poverty ManagementAbstract
This study examines the transformation of social assistance into an instrument of electoral politics during the 2024 Legislative Election in Kupang Regency, Indonesia. While previous studies have widely discussed clientelism and vote buying, limited attention has been given to the management of social assistance as a political business at the local level. This research employs a qualitative case study approach through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and field observations involving political actors, bureaucrats, village heads, campaign teams, and aid recipients. Data were analyzed using thematic-critical analysis. The findings reveal that social assistance functions not only as a welfare instrument but also as electoral capital managed through patronage networks, personal funds, legislative initiatives, and bureaucratic intermediaries. Assistance distribution was used to maintain loyalty, political memory, and reciprocal obligations among poor communities. Many recipients perceived aid as a personal favor rather than a social right guaranteed by the state. This study introduces the concept of the political business of welfare to explain how poverty is transformed into an electoral resource through the personalization of social assistance. The study contributes to the literature on welfare politics and electoral clientelism in local democratic contexts.
References
Asaloei, S. I., Rompas, W. Y., and Tumiwa, J. W. (2026). The Influence of Capital, Education, and Motivation of Female Fisherwomen on the Development of Fisheries Entrepreneurship in Manado City. Sharia Economic and Management Business Journal (SEMBJ), 7(1), 20–27.
Bahamonde, H., and Canales, A. (2022). Electoral risk and vote buying, introducing prospect theory to the experimental study of clientelism. Electoral Studies, 80, 102497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102497
Baniya, J., Meserve, S. A., Pemstein, D., & Seim, B. (2024). Understanding vote buying in Nepali elections. Electoral Studies, 88, 102766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102766
Batool, S., & Ali, R. (2021). Rethinking reflexivity and positionality in researching happiness: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in Pakistan. Women's Studies International Forum, 89, 102537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2021.102537
Bobbink, P., Larkin, P., & Probst, S. (2024). Application and challenges of using a constructivist grounded theory methodology to address an undertheorized clinical challenge: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 6, 100199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100199
Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Carreras, M., & İrepoğlu, Y. (2013). Trust in elections, vote buying, and turnout in Latin America. Electoral Studies, 32(4), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.012
Central Bureau of Statistics. (2024). The percentage of the poor population in March 2024 fell to 9.03 percent. Central Bureau of Statistics. https://www.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2024/07/01/2370/persentase-penduduk-miskin-maret-2024-turun-menjadi-9-03-persen-.html
Central Statistics Agency of Kupang Regency. (2025). Kupang Regency in Figures 2025. Central Statistics Agency of Kupang Regency. https://kupangkab.bps.go.id/publication/2025/02/28/b406ce0aa71bf7e263157a1f/kabupaten-kupang-dalam-angka-2025.html
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (4th ed., Vol. 30). SAGE.
De La O, A. L. (2024). How clientelism undermines state capacity: Evidence from Mexican municipalities. World Development, 173, 106344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106344
Duchoslav, J., Kenamu, E., and Thunde, J. (2023). Targeting hunger or votes? The political economy of humanitarian transfers in Malawi. World Development, 165, 106179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106179
Efendi, M. S., Daulay, T. H., and Yustati, H. (2024). The Role of Financial Literacy in Students’ Personal Finances. Sharia Economic and Management Business Journal (SEMBJ), 5(3), 73–77.
Frey, A. (2019). Cash transfers, clientelism, and political enfranchisement: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Public Economics, 176, 1–17.
Frey, A. (2019). Cash transfers, clientelism, and political enfranchisement: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Public Economics, 176, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.05.002
Fried, B. J. (2012). Distributive politics and conditional cash transfers: the case of Brazil’s Bolsa Família. World Development, 40(5), 1042–1053.
Fried, B. J. (2012). Distributive politics and conditional cash transfers: The case of Brazil’s Bolsa Família. World Development, 40(5), 1042–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.09.022
Gallego, J., Guardado, J., and Wantchekon, L. (2023). Do gifts buy votes? Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. World Development, 162, 106125.
Garay, C., Palmer-Rubin, B., & Poertner, M. (2020). Organizational and partisan brokerage of social benefits: Social policy linkages in Mexico. World Development, 136, 105103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105103
Gisselquist, R. M., Niño-Zarazúa, M., and Sen, K. (2024). Clientelist politics and development. World Development, 178, 106601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106601
Haseeb, M., & Vyborny, K. (2022). Data, discretion and institutional capacity: Evidence from cash transfers in Pakistan. Journal of Public Economics, 206, 104535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104535
Irawan, F. (2024). The Influence of Work Motivation, Work Environment, and Work Culture on Employee Performance (Case Study at the Bengkulu City Trade and Industry Service). Sharia Economic and Management Business Journal (SEMBJ), 5(2), 58–66.
Jensen, P. S., and Justesen, M. K. (2014). Poverty and vote buying: Survey-based evidence from Africa. Electoral Studies, 33, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.020
Jöst, P., and Lust, E. (2022). Receiving more, expecting less? Social ties, clientelism, and the poor’s expectations of future service provision. World Development, 158, 106008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106008
Justesen, M. K., Koob, S., and Smid, S. (2025). Clientelism and programmatic redistribution: Evidence from a conjoint survey experiment in Brazil. World Development, 195, 107124.
Kao, K., Lust, E., and Rakner, L. (2022). Vote-buying, anti-corruption campaigns, and identity in African elections. World Development, 160, 106064.
Karim, R. M. (2025). Voter-buying, politician selection, and public good provision in Brazil. Journal of Development Economics, 176, 103507.
Kramon, E. (2016). Where is vote buying effective? Evidence from a list experiment in Kenya. Electoral Studies, 44, 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.09.006
Kramon, E. (2016). Where is vote buying effective? Evidence from a list experiment in Kenya. Electoral Studies, 44, 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.09.006
Kyriacou, A. P. (2023). Clientelism and fiscal redistribution: Evidence across countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 76, 102234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2022.102234
Kyriacou, A. P. (2023). Clientelism and fiscal redistribution: Evidence across countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 76, 102234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2022.102234
Labonne, J. (2013). The local electoral impacts of conditional cash transfers. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.04.006
Labonne, J. (2013). The local electoral impacts of conditional cash transfers: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.04.006
Leight, J., Foarta, D., Pande, R., and Ralston, L. (2020). Value for money? Vote-buying and politician accountability. Journal of Public Economics, 190, 104227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104227
Lindberg, S. I., Bue, M. C. Lo, and Sen, K. (2022). Clientelism, corruption, and the rule of law. World Development, 158, 105989.
Lindberg, S. I., Lo Bue, M. C., & Sen, K. (2022). Clientelism, corruption and the rule of law. World Development, 158, 105989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105989
Lindberg, S. I., Lo Bue, M. C., & Sen, K. (2022). Clientelism, corruption and the rule of law. World Development, 158, 105989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105989
Mahyudin, A. (2023). Development of Canva Learning Media for Islamic Education and Character Education Subjects in Phase C of Elementary School. Journal of Instructional and Development Researches, 3(4), 169–177.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., and Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
Mizuno, N., and Okazawa, R. (2025). A dynamic theory on clientelism and bureaucratic development. Journal of Development Economics, 174, 103438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103438
Nichter, S. (2014). Conceptualizing vote buying. Electoral Studies, 35, 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.02.008
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice (Fourth edition). SAGE.
Pinto, T. L. S., Tabak, B. M., and Cajueiro, D. O. (2023). How politics can influence the allocation of social program benefits: A case study of the Brazilian poverty reduction program Bolsa Família. Economic Analysis and Policy, 80, 77–89.
Poirier, B., Haag, D., Soares, G., & Jamieson, L. (2023). Whose values, what bias, which subjectivity?: The need for reflexivity and positionality in epidemiological health equity scholarship. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 47(5), 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100079
Ravanilla, N., and Hicken, A. (2023). Poverty, social networks, and clientelism. World Development, 162, 106128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106128
Riznando, R., Yopi, Y., and Pranata, G. A. (2024). Forms of Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesian Sharia Banks. Sharia Economic and Management Business Journal (SEMBJ), 5(1), 33–37.
Rodríguez, F. (2024). How clientelism works: Evidence from the Barinas special election. World Development, 184, 106734.
Sari, Y. N., and Yustati, H. (2024). The Significance of the Development of the Salted Fish Industry for Community Economic Growth from an Islamic Economic Perspective (Study on Baai Island, Kampung Melayu, Bengkulu City). Sharia Economic and Management Business Journal (SEMBJ), 5(1), 1–8.
Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (Second edition). Wiley Blackwell.
Wahidah, T. N., Asnaini, A., and Makmur, M. (2024). Application of the Mudharabah Agreement in the Profit-Sharing System for Cattle Raising (A Study in Penago II Village, Ilir Talo District, Seluma Regency). Sharia Economic and Management Business Journal (SEMBJ), 5(1), 22–27.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lasarus Jehamat, Liliweri Aloysius, Laurensius P Sayrani, Rudi Rohi, Ernestus Holivil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright :
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
- The author acknowledges that the Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (GIJLSS) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at GIJLSS.
