From Engagement to Acquisition: The Strategic Transformation of Indonesia–Türkiye Defense Cooperation and the Purchase of the KAAN Fighter Jet
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i4.910Keywords:
Indonesia–Türkiye Relations, Defense Diplomacy, Defense Industry, KAAN Fighter AircraftAbstract
This study examines the gradual transformation of Indonesia–Türkiye defense relations culminating in Indonesia's participation in the KAAN fifth-generation fighter aircraft program. Existing studies predominantly analyze bilateral economic cooperation or defense-industrial development separately, leaving the mechanisms underlying the evolution of strategic partnership insufficiently explained. This research employs a qualitative case study approach using semi-structured interviews, official government documents, defense policy reports, and academic literature. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis supported by source triangulation and interpreted using the frameworks of Complex Interdependence, Defense Diplomacy, and Strategic Autonomy. The findings reveal that Indonesia–Türkiye defense cooperation evolved through four sequential stages: industrial engagement, industrial collaboration, strategic dialogue, and strategic acquisition. Economic interdependence and sustained industrial cooperation fostered institutional trust, facilitated technology transfer, strengthened defense-industrial integration, and enabled high-level strategic coordination, ultimately supporting Indonesia's involvement in the KAAN program. This study proposes a four-stage transformation model that explains how bilateral defense cooperation evolves from economic interaction into a comprehensive strategic partnership. The findings contribute to the literature on defense diplomacy and provide policy insights for strengthening Indonesia's defense industrial capability through long-term international collaboration.
References
Bisley, N. (2013). Great powers in the changing international order. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Biscop, S. (2019). European strategic autonomy: Bringing strategy back in. Egmont Paper, 103, 1–35.
Bitzinger, R. A. (2015). Defense industries in Asia and the technonationalist impulse. Contemporary Security Policy, 36(3), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2015.1061759
Brauer, J., & Dunne, J. P. (2012). Arms Trade and Economic Development: Theory, Policy and Cases in Arms Trade Offsets. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203128986
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press.
Cottey, A., & Forster, A. (2004). Reshaping defence diplomacy: New roles for military cooperation and assistance. Routledge.
Chuter, D. (2011). Defence diplomacy: A new paradigm for security cooperation. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 10(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.10.1.02
Directorate General of Defense Potential, Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Indonesia. (2025). Indonesia–Türkiye defense industry cooperation program. Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Indonesia.
Dunne, J. P., & Tian, N. (2019). Military expenditure, arms production and arms trade. In The Oxford Handbook of Peace Economics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199389583.013.28
Fiott, D. (2018). Strategic autonomy: Towards "European sovereignty" in defence? European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) Brief, 12, 1–8.
Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009958
Katadata. (2025). Total and balance Indonesia–Turkey trade 2015–2025. https://katadata.co.id
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Little, Brown and Company.
Kibaroglu, M. (2020). Turkey's defence industry: Progress, challenges and prospects. Insight Turkey, 22(4), 91–110.
Krahmann, E. (2005). Security governance and networks: New theoretical perspectives in transatlantic security. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 18(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570500059538
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Markowski, S., Hall, P., & Wylie, R. (2010). Defence procurement and industry policy: A small country perspective. Defence and Peace Economics, 21(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690903568819
Mölling, C. (2020). European strategic autonomy: Moving beyond the buzzword. Survival, 62(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2020.1739955
Muthanna, K. A. (2011). Military diplomacy. Journal of Defence Studies, 5(1), 1–15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohamad Indra Israqi, M. Hamdan Basyar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright :
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
- The author acknowledges that the Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (GIJLSS) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at GIJLSS.
