Reconstructing State and Corporate Responsibility within the Human Rights Framework in Indonesia’s Mining Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.1095Keywords:
business and human rights, corporate responsibility, Indonesia, mining, state responsibilityAbstract
The development of the business and human rights regime represents a significant challenge to the classical paradigm that positions the state as the sole duty bearer in the protection of human rights. In Indonesia's mining sector, recurring social and environmental conflicts illustrate that violations of the rights to a healthy environment, health, and livelihood cannot be attributed exclusively to the state's failure to fulfill its obligations to respect, protect, and fulfill human rights. These violations are also closely linked to corporate conduct. Despite the introduction of the protect-respect-remedy framework by the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), the implementation of these principles in Indonesia remains constrained by normative and institutional limitations. These limitations include the weak binding force of the National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (Rencana Aksi Nasional Bisnis dan Hak Asasi Manusia, RAN BHAM) and the fragmentation of victim remedy mechanisms. This study seeks to reconstruct the responsibilities of the state and corporations in an integrated manner within the mining sector. Employing a normative legal approach through statutory, conceptual, comparative, and historical methods, this study identifies a structural mismatch between legal obligations and the distribution of economic power. The proposed contribution involves a model of collaborative responsibility that integrates state duties, corporate human rights due diligence, and coordinated remedy mechanisms. This integrated approach is designed to enhance human rights protection in mining governance.
References
Andrew, C. (2006). Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Oxford University Press.
Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Cornell University Press.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (1966).
Jean-Jacques, R. (1762). Du Contrat Social ou Principes du Droit Politique. Marc Michel Rey.
Kholis, N. (2025). KONSTRUKSI TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA DAN KORPORASI DALAM KERANGKA HAK AZASI MANUSIA PADA SEKTOR PERTAMBANGAN. Universitas Indonesia.
Komnas HAM. (2021). Laporan Tahunan Komnas HAM.
Rencana Aksi Nasional Bisnis Dan Hak Asasi Manusia (RAN BHAM) 2021–2024 (2021).
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia (1945).
Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara (2020).
Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia (1999).
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas (2007).
United Nations. (2011). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. United Nations.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Kholis, Satya Arinanto, Patricia Rinwigati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright :
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
- The author acknowledges that the Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (GIJLSS) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at GIJLSS.






















