Algorithmic Constitutionality: New Challenges for Constitutional Law in The Era of Artificial Intelligence

Authors

  • Vidi Galenso Syarief Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Iblam, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Marjan Miharja Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Iblam, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Gunawan Nachrawi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Iblam, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Yusuf Gunawan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Iblam, Jakarta, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.996

Keywords:

Algorithmic Constitutionality, Constitutional Law, Artificial Intelligence, Human Rights, Digital Governance

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence/AI) technology has encouraged the use of algorithms in various aspects of government administration, including administrative decision-making, public service delivery, and the management of state data. The presence of algorithms as decision-making instruments raises new issues in constitutional law, particularly in relation to the principles of constitutionality, constitutional supremacy, the protection of human rights, and the general principles of good governance. This article aims to analyze the position of algorithms from the perspective of constitutional law and to examine the constitutional challenges arising from the use of algorithms in governmental practice in the era of artificial intelligence. The research method employed is normative legal research using a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. The legal materials used include statutory regulations and legal literature relevant to the development of digital technology and algorithm-based governance. The findings indicate that the use of algorithms in government has the potential to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and transparency of public services; however, it also poses serious challenges to the principle of constitutionality, such as the risk of algorithmic discrimination, lack of transparency (black box algorithm), and the potential violation of the right to personal data protection and the right to procedural justice. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the legal framework and constitutional oversight mechanisms for the use of algorithms in government administration, including the establishment of specific regulations, algorithmic accountability standards, and judicial oversight that is adaptive to technological developments.

References

Abdulloh, Khairul Fadli Rambe, and Mulia Darma. “Regulatory Reform in The Era of Digital Constitutionalism.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 15, no. 1 (2026): 59–80. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.15.1.2026.59-80.

Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2020.

Atmaja, Bima Kumara Dwi, and Firmansyah Krisna Maulana. “The Constitutional Limits of State Use of Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia.” Bengkoelen Justice: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 2 (2026).

Avbelj, Matej. “Reconceptualizing Constitutionalism in the AI Run Algorithmic Society.” German Law Journal 25, no. 7 (2024): 1081–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2024.35.

Barocas, Solon, and Andrew D Selbst. “Big Data’s Disparate Impact.” California Law Review 104, no. 3 (2016): 671–732. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2477899.

Commission, European. “Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act).” Brussels, 2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52021PC0206.

Hildebrandt, Mireille. Law for Computer Scientists and Other Folk. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/law-for-computer-scientists-and-other-folk-9780198860884.

Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2019.

Indonesia, Government of. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (2018). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/96913/perpres-no-95-tahun-2018.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.

Pasquale, Frank. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674970847.

Russell, Stuart J, and Peter Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 4th ed. Pearson Education, 2021. https://aima.cs.berkeley.edu/.

Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2018.

Solove, Daniel J. Understanding Privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674035072.

Yeung, Karen. “Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation.” Regulation & Governance 12, no. 4 (2018): 505–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158.

Zarsky, Tal Z. “Transparent Predictions.” University of Illinois Law Review 2013, no. 4 (2013): 1503–69. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2324240.

Published

2026-07-23

How to Cite

Galenso Syarief, V., Miharja, M., Nachrawi, G., & Gunawan, Y. (2026). Algorithmic Constitutionality: New Challenges for Constitutional Law in The Era of Artificial Intelligence. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 4(3), 678–684. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.996