The Concept of Peaceful Fines on The Implementation of Restorative Justice in The Development of Criminal Law in Indonesia

Authors

  • Alwafi Setyana Mufid Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rachmat Sentika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Joko Setiono Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v3i2.489

Keywords:

Peace Fines, Corruption, Restorative Justice, Police Department

Abstract

There is a conceptual error in the existence of peaceful fines when viewed from the implementation of peaceful fines itself, especially when applied to minor corruption crimes, which basically can be attached to the police institution, so that the fast track of criminal justice can be realised. Therefore, the purpose of the research conducted by researchers in this study is to find the concept of peaceful fines for the incorporation of restorative justice into Indonesia's evolving criminal code. Descriptive analysis is the research specification, and a normative juridical approach is the research methodology. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal resources are the sources of the data. This research found that there is a social contract attached to state responsibility for the losses suffered by victims. This state responsibility is substantially and fundamentally attached to the state by attaching environmental losses and community losses in addition to state financial losses. Thus, the concept of punishment for corruption offences will be erroneous when only the state finances that are harmed are the focus. This also leads to amicable fines being the focus of punishment for corruption offences which will also be erroneous. The implementation of the concept of restorative justice in the form of peaceful fines places the Police as the implementer considering the ‘vanguard’ of law enforcement in Indonesia. On the other hand, the police also function as a conduit of information or a copy to the prosecutor's office and judges in court, the final result of which is an amicable fine set by the court.

References

Adinda Shafiyah, Elisatris Gultom. (2024). Hukum Sebagai Pengatur Dan Pelindung Kehidupan Sosial Individu Dan Masyarakat. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 2 (10), 466-471, Doi: https://doi.org/10.59435/gjmi.v2i11.484

Ali Marwan HSB. (2016). Mengkritisi Pemberlakuan Teori Fiksi Hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 16(3). 251 - 264

Andri Kristanto. (2022). Kajian Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif, Jurnal 7(1), 180-193. DOI: 10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss1.art14.

Dani Aswara, “Wacana Denda Damai bagi Koruptor, Komisi Kejaksaan: Harus Punya Landasan Hukum Kuat“, diakses melalui https://www.tempo.co/politik/wacana-denda-damai-bagi-koruptor-komisi-kejaksaan-harus-punya-landasan-hukum-kuat-1192321,

Dwi Atmoko, Amalia Syauket. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau dari Perspektif Dampak Serta Upaya Pemberantasan. Binamulia Hukum, 11 (2), 177-191, DOI: 10.37893/jbh.v11i2.732

Eddy OS Hiariej. (2014). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta.

G.P. Hoemagels. (2013). The Other Side of Criminology, Kluwer Deventer, Holland.

Hanaf Arifi, Ningrum Ambarsari. (2018). Penerapan Prinsip Restoratif Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia, Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum 10(2), 173-190. DOI: 10.31602/aladl.v10i2.1362.

Indra Gunawan. (2023). Penggunaan Denda Damai Dalam Tindak Pidana Ekonomi. The Prosecutor Law Review, 1(2), 68-86

Ismail Ali. (2023). Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan, LEGAL: Journal of Law, 2(1), 43-55, DOI: https://jurnal.lamaddukelleng.ac.id/index.php/legal/article/view/48 hlm 43

Johny Ibrahim. (2008). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia, Surabaya.

Moeljatno. (2015). Asas-Asas HukumPidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Niko Muhammad Insani. (2024). Paradigma Restorative Justice dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana (Studi Kasus Pencurian 1 Unit Handphone di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat Tahun 2023). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Humaniora dan Politik, 4(6). 2403-2411, DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp

Rabith Madah Khulaili Harsya, (2022), Penetapan Sanksi Pidana Dan Tindakan Sebagai Sistem Pemidanaan Di Indonesia, Yustisia Merdeka: Jurnal Imiah Hukum, 8(2), 57-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v8i2.182

Rolando Ritonga. (2023). Manifestasi Kewenangan Kejaksaan Dalam Penerapan Denda Damai Dalam Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Guna Mengubah Tatanan Sosial Masyaraka. The Prosecutor Law Review, 1(2), 21-34

Sigar P. Berutu, et al. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Nomor 152/Pid.C/2014/Pn.Rap Dikaitkan Dengan Perma Tentang Tindak Pidana Ringan Nomor 2 Tahun 2012. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 7(2). 4691-4702

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji. (2003). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Soerjono Soekanto. (2010). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UII Press, Jakarta

Yulida Medistiara, “Jaksa Agung Ingin Korupsi di Bawah Rp 50 Juta Tak Dipidana, Ini Alasannya”, diakses melalui https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5973554/jaksa-agung-ingin-korupsi-di-bawah-rp-50-juta-tak-dipidana-ini-alasannya,

Zulkarnain Koto, Syafruddin, Tagor Hutapea. (2024). Kebijakan Polri Dalam Upaya Mengefektifkan Penerapan Konsep Hukum Pidana Baru Dalam Uu Ri Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang KUHP. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 18(1), 1-21, DOI: https://doi.org/10.35879/jik.v18i1.445.

Published

2025-08-25

How to Cite

Mufid, A. S., Sentika, R., & Setiono, J. (2025). The Concept of Peaceful Fines on The Implementation of Restorative Justice in The Development of Criminal Law in Indonesia. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 3(2), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v3i2.489

Most read articles by the same author(s)