Appropriate Mediation Mechanism in the Resolution of Copyright Infringements to Achieve Restorative Justice

Authors

  • Dyah Nur Sasanti Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Evita Isretno Israhadi Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v3i3.635

Keywords:

copyright, mediation, restorative justice

Abstract

Copyright creates economic benefits for creators and/or copyrights holders. The digital era provides opportunities for creations to become more famous through available platforms, which then open up monetization opportunities. However, it also leads to a vulnerability to violations, such as the uploading of movies or songs without the permission of the creator and/or copyright holder, which can be enjoyed by anyone without royalties. The draft of Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, which is planned to be enforced soon, essentially prioritizes the resolution of criminal acts through the application of restorative justice. Indonesian Copyright Law places criminal punishment for copyright infringement that does not constitute piracy as a final attempt (ultimum remedium) by requiring mediation before criminal prosecution if the parties are known to exist and/or are located in Indonesia. Unfortunately, mediation does not cover during ongoing criminal prosecution processes, so that restorative justice, especially compensation for losses incurred by creators and/or copyright holders, is difficult to achieve. This article uses a descriptive-analytical normative legal approach supported by secondary data that collected through literature studies, aiming to find the appropriate mediation mechanism to achieve restorative justice, even if a copyright infringement has entered the prosecution stage. This article concludes that mediation as regulated in Indonesian Copyright Law still finds it difficult to achieve restorative justice. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate legislation on appropriate mediation mechanisms for resolving copyright infringements, both before criminal prosecution are filed and during the prosecution process, so that true restorative justice can be achieved.

References

Hediati, F. N., & Andini, O. G. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Cipta Melalui Restorative Justice. Seminar Nasional Hukum, Sosial dan Ekonomi, 40-46. Diambil kembali dari https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/sanksi/article/view/14309

Lubis, E. (2021). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0-5.0. Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada.

Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Meliala, E. M., Purba, A. G., & Silaban, R. (2022, Agustus). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Cipta, Potret Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Jurnal Retentum, 3, 122-136. doi:10.46930/retentum.v3i2.2023

Rahmawati, M., & Saputro, A. A. (2022). Peluang dan Tantangan Penerapan Restorative Justice. (M. S. Ginting, Penyunt.) Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform.

Rongiyati, S. (2018, Juni). Pelindungan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Pada Produk Ekonomi Kreatif. Negara Hukum, 9, 39-58. doi:https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v9i1.1001

Triana, N. (2019). Alternative Dispute Resolution: Penyelesaian Sengketa alternatif Dengan Model Mediasi, Arbitrase, Negosiasi dan Konsiliasi. Yogyakarta: Kaizen Sarana Edukasi.

Published

2025-11-24

How to Cite

Dyah Nur Sasanti, & Evita Isretno Israhadi. (2025). Appropriate Mediation Mechanism in the Resolution of Copyright Infringements to Achieve Restorative Justice. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 3(3), 1375–1380. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v3i3.635

Most read articles by the same author(s)